More people put their personal information online (address, telephone, number,…) for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking purposes. Do you think it is a positive or negative developments.
These days, utilizing the internet is implied to become increasingly popular and give an imperative boost to human life. A majority of people have a tendency to provide their private details online for the daily routines comprising of social accounts or monetary purposes. From my perspective, although this propensity may bring about some certain drawbacks, its merits commonly outweigh.
Initially, several shortcomings putting personal information online exert on human life. It is irrefutable the given private details may easily be revealed due to the sophisticated online hacking scheme. Furthermore, some website owners have a propensity to sell stolen identity records at an extremely exorbitant price. That sold information is shown to be abused and used for different illicit purposes consisting of cheating and criminal activities. Consequently, the suppliers are proved to commonly be vulnerable to cyber-crimes which also increase the security risks and considerably alleviate the reliability of the Internet.
Nevertheless, despite the aforementioned disadvantages, the users still reap many superior benefits from updating personal information. Undeniably, the Internet may significantly cater to human demands involve amusements, banking, and others. With the continual enhancement of diverse functions, most ordinary processes are considerably minimized that assists humans in lessening the time-consuming. Additionally, through associating personal details with particular accounts, the Internet may foster an overall convenience in human life. Under the development of e-commerce platforms, purchasers are not required to go to the physical stores, they could add their chosen items into the shopping cart and wait for the delivery.
In conclusion, I do believe that providing private information to the Internet may facilitate a better user experience, albeit its negligible downsides. Therefore, to surpass living standards, people had better carefully considered Internet usages.
- More people put their personal information online address telephone number for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking purposes Do you think it is a positive or negative developments 84
- These days only few young people enjoy classical music concerts or play or play classical music Why Should young people be encouraged to attend and learn more 84
- Some parents send their children to preschool when they are three or four years old Other parents wait until their children are old enough for primary school before they send them to school Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of sending children to p 72
- The line chart shows the number of children participating in three kinds of sports in a club from 2008 to 2014 78
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others however say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required Discuss both these views and give your 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: COMPRISING_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprising' or 'consisting of'?
Suggestion: comprising; consisting of
...e details online for the daily routines comprising of social accounts or monetary purposes. F...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 728, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hopping cart and wait for the delivery. In conclusion, I do believe that providi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1724.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.09187279152 5.12529762239 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22580974231 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.678445229682 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.9534533744 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.933333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8666666667 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.06666666667 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133245332637 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0415323761192 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513800104317 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0752136050187 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205212542448 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.37 50.2224549098 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.04 12.4159519038 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.34 8.58950901804 132% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.