As people consider the Internet as an essential part of their life, they tend to even show personal information such as an address, telephone number, etc,… on these platforms. Despite some advantages that may derive from this arrangement, it is felt that publicising these sorts of information is predominantly disadvantageous to an individual. This will be proven by looking at how intrusive and risky it could be.
For one, even though putting personal information online makes people’s profiles more reliable, there could be some disturbance from that. For example, one of my friends said they regret posting personal information on the Internet because she had experienced sexual harassment via phone. Moreover, the feeling of being followed is uncomfortable at all. My friend’s experience clearly shows that showing details about private life is unpleasant and annoying.
In addition to this, these actions make ways for cybercrime, which deliberately steals personal information or bank details. They illegally use personal information as a means of providing them with money. For instance, a public figure has quickly become a victim of hackers when posting bank account numbers on social media. Sadly, he virtually lost all the money inside the account due to his blind faith in the virtual world. As this story illustrates, the disadvantages of publicising personal information online are enormous.
To conclude, despite the advantages of increasing reliability and convenience, showing private information has many more drawbacks than favourable points. It is hoped that an individual will think carefully before sharing any information relating to privacy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...uch as an address, telephone number, etc,… on these platforms. Despite some advant...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, may, moreover, so, for example, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60236220472 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05328350224 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.669291338583 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.158469234 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.642857143 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236270530139 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723592198469 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644922254093 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126970169294 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348440332934 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.