Most alcoholics purchase liquor legally. According to your point of view, should stores in general be legally allowed to sell liquor to alcoholics?
In recent years, there has been a growing debate whether some people think should stop to sell liquor to alcoholics. It is put forward that it is advantageous. The opponent, on the other hand, argues that there are several drawbacks. In this essay will identify both the benefits and drawback surrounding this issue before coming to the reasoned conclusion.
To begin with, the point in favour of alcoholics should not purchase alcohol, the most effective one is perhaps that drink too much could affect human behaviours. In other words, most bottle shop should concern their customer behaviours before the sale the liquor for them. According to statistics revealed by the United Nations clearly, demonstrate that about 100 percent of Australian prefer to follow this trend.
Despite the advantages discussed above, there are a number of negatives arising out of the liquor law is not only for alcoholics as well. One of the most conspicuous disadvantages is that over drinking could damage human health. This is evidenced by the fact that most liquor could make people edition. For instance, over drinking could make health problem such as hart desist or mental illness.
To sum, it can be observed that there are both benefits and ill effect in relation to whether liquor law should be thread series. To choose which side I am on, I believe that advantages surpass the disadvantages, owing to the reason discussed above.
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss. 56
- Certain kinds of music promote learning in their life. Agree or disagree. 56
- Most alcoholics purchase liquor legally. According to your point of view, should stores in general be legally allowed to sell liquor to alcoholics? 56
- The World is becoming a forest of the building. It is becoming difficult to find trees everywhere. What is the main reason for the global warming? Can you suggest ways, to eradicate global warming? 56
- Some people argue Laws changes human behavior whereas some disagree. Do you agree with it? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, for instance, such as, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1197.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 235.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09361702128 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59916064036 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.617021276596 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 363.6 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7275755969 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0769230769 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0769230769 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253235146454 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734969282158 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748665454233 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137865814945 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630719105299 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.