In most of the education systems, students are assessed by written examinations. Do you think it is a good idea or not? Give your reasons.
Nowadays, the methods of examination has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the world, which leads to a moot question “whether written examination can be a proper approach for assessing students or not?”. It is a widely held view that modern evaluation is highly beneficial, whereas I tend to believe that one must weigh up carefully the pros and cons of this issue.
To begin with, it is a common belief that education and an advanced curriculum that based on both written and new examination plays a vital role in each society. To put into consideration, I express some reasons why I support this idea. First and foremost is that in the written exam may some students perform well in the exam because of underlying knowledge while others may perform poor due to anxiety and stress. Secondly, it can be argued that other educational methods, such as oral presentation, team-work project, and multiple question exams help the test takers to promote their self-confidence as well as making more interaction as a group. In addition to this information, it should be mentioned that candidates will have more brain-storm as well as outstanding performance with new methods. A group of scientists, working at a prestigious university conducted that the rate of the prosperity of candidates has become increased by modern methods in recent years.
However, there is no doubt that written exam provides people with various positive points. It should be taken into account that written exam will make candidates to be evaluated in equal situations. Moreover, it is quite clear that students are not able to match them with the new content and the activity of numerous subjects.
To recapitulate, I entirely agree that modern education instead of traditional methods must be taken into consideration. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce stricter legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
..., the methods of examination has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, while, in addition, no doubt, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1684.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2298136646 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02105441867 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593167701863 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8436907272 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.538461538 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7692307692 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0926343512886 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0316742273949 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0245074756227 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0531269632114 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0171345295713 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.