It is true that science has various goals and roles to play in our lives. I completely agree with the idea that the vital aim of science is to enhance the quality of life.
Science plays a significant role in the development of a nation, ranging from technology and health to the environment. Firstly, the aim of science may be to develop advanced technologies and this will lead to a thriving nation. Secondly, medical developments are also rooted in scientific knowledge. For example, new medicines are found and applied based on breakthroughs in scientific research. Finally, from knowledge from different fields, we can protect and preserve the environment that is being damaged by climate change.
Despite the aims mentioned above, I believe that the most important purpose of science is to improve people's lives. The development of technology can result in a strong economy, medical advances can help to improve health, and a sustainable environment can bring a better life for future generations, but all of those things should be to serve people's benefits, not to make money from scientific knowledge. Some scientific research are just to earn money and harm the environment. For example, people can study to find a new plastic that is cheaper than the existing one, but it can have a negative impact on animals and people as a whole. Furthermore, understanding about science stems from research of people and it is reasonable that it should be used for people’s aims.
In conclusion, it seems to me that although science is developed with various aims, the most crucial purpose should be to support people's lives.
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 67
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives 61
- In many countries around the world rural people are moving to cities so the population in the countryside is decreasing Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 56
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 61
- The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0594795539 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87778446495 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550185873606 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9295406668 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.692307692 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350903469647 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12093170816 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11911242783 0.0667982634062 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206968523508 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0929732963295 0.056905535591 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.