Nowadays, people around the globe are having higher longevity. There seems to be two main causes involved, and for the society this can be a negative development. The reasons for which will be enumerated in this essay.
Firstly, one of the main factor contributing to this trend is the improvements in in better health care facilities. Today in this 21st century technology is so advanced that there is a cure for almost all the diseases present in the world. Furthermore, nowadays better health care facilities are available to almost all the people, comparetively at a lower cost, and procedures such as heart and liver transplant help people to live longer. For example, in Switzerland an average person dies at an age of 110, this is due to the universal health care system provided there. Another major factor is the consumption of healthy diet by people. Today, most people are going for protein rich foods rather than consuming convenience food items. This has reduced problems such as obesity and inadequate development, helping people to live longer.
Secondly, although higher longevity is beneficial, it can have a negative impact on the society, especially on the younger generation. This means that young people have to bear the burden for an increasingly elderly population, compelling them to pay higher taxes, work longer hours, possibly forcing them to migrate to other countries where this pressure is lower. The effect of this is the 'brain drain' situation, where young and ambitious people leave their countries for better living prospects. Japan is a shining example for this. Studies have found out that due to higher longevity of the elderly population, Japanese youngsters are moving out of the country.
In conclusion, improvements in health care facilities and consumption of healthy diet are the main causes of higher longevity among people. This is a negative development because it affects the younger generation of a nation.
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think this is a positive or negative social development 78
- Many countries increase the amount of household garbage going to landfill every year What are the causes What can be done to reduce it 90
- The internet is viewed as an excellent means of communication by many However there are some who would argue that it is actually destroying our communication skills Discuss both views and give your opinion 92
- Many doctors are concerned about the high use of computer games by children and young people What mental and physical problems may arise from excessive use of these games How could these problems be reduced 89
- since traveling abroad became relatively inexpensive more countries opened their doors for foreign tourists is it a positive or negative trend give your opinion and include relevant examples 87
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: in
...uting to this trend is the improvements in in better health care facilities. Today in...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21202531646 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80338133038 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550632911392 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8693435138 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8823529412 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5882352941 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301948427781 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0960959268442 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659602289113 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176658148317 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0189703263034 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: in
...uting to this trend is the improvements in in better health care facilities. Today in...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21202531646 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80338133038 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550632911392 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8693435138 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8823529412 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5882352941 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301948427781 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0960959268442 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659602289113 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176658148317 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0189703263034 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.