Most people accept that we now live in a globalised world but not everyone agrees
that this is beneficial.
To what extent is globalisation a positive or negative development?
It is unquestionable that globalization has exerted significant changes to humans’ daily life. However, opinions diverge on whether this trend should be considered as advantageous or detrimental. In my view, the opportunities of living in the era of globalization outweigh the challenges it has brought.
On the one hand, there is little doubt that globalization is to be responsible for creating serious problems to every country in the world. First and foremost, due to the growth of globalization, many local cultures in every country have been facing the risk of erosion and extinction. For instance, many Vietnamese nowadays insert foreign words in their daily conversations in an inappropriate manner, which can lead to the deterioration of their national language. Also, globalization also exacerbates pandemic, by which millions of people could be killed, as people of different nationalities can effortlessly travel across countries and continents.
Nevertheless, globalization has brought a number of positive changes to the development of human race. It is easy to notice that trade and commerce has been proliferating on an unprecedented scale thanks to the cooperation among countries. As a result, with the profits gained from international trade and commercial activities, the economy of each country and of the world as a whole can grow rapidly, which in turn contributes to the wellbeing of every member of the society. Furthermore, developing countries may also have the chance to learn from the developed countries in various fields, ranging from technology to human education. This could help to shorten the development gap between wealthy and underdeveloped country.
All in all, despite the negative aspects of globalization, the benefits it has brought should be considered greater.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-26 | patrick2312 | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-26 | patrick2312 | 56 | view |
| 2020-03-10 | Hector Padilla | 84 | view |
| 2020-03-10 | Hector Padilla | 56 | view |
| 2020-02-06 | tranhien297 | 81 | view |
- Does stricter punishment improve safety on our roads 78
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. The flowchart illustrates the production of coloured plastic paper clips in a small factory. Write a report for a university tutor describing the production process. 61
- Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money making attractions Others believe it is the only way to save these traditions Discuss both sides and give your opinion 11
- Prompt Nowadays some people think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is it the case Is it a positive or negative development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 375, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an inappropriate manner" with adverb for "inappropriate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...eign words in their daily conversations in an inappropriate manner, which can lead to the deterioration of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, well, for instance, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56884057971 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38183639023 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586956521739 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6225644311 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.230769231 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0902122687102 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0321354344536 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0268312935099 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0491201596568 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221303843841 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.