Most people in what are known as the developed nations have homes full of gadgets and labor-saving devices, from vacuum cleaners and dishwashers to the latest in computer technology. Some people claim that despite all these labor-saving devices, we seem t

Recently, the phenomenon of advanced mechanical devices used in homes in developed countries and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that existing labor-saving devices in homes are highly beneficial, such issue regarded as thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that using these devices can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin with, there are various reasons to support that living in homes with advanced devices has more free time and convenient. At first, the one of disadvantages with living in modern houses is less exersize, the cause of many diseases. However, these houses made more free time for us. For example, the home works have done faster than before the advent of recent appliances such as vacuum cleaner and dishwasher.
In addition, depending on these gadgets has negative effects on people's living. But, they made our life simplest and more convenience. People can do their works themselves in homes full of computer devices. For instance, a recent research conducted by MTR University researchers in 2016 has shown that a significant number of computer appliances in modern houses play the role of one servant and people no need to employ any person to service to them.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on this statement, I profoundly believe that the benefits of this computer devices are far outweighed their drawbacks.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 453, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o employ any person to service to them. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1274.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 242.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26446280992 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86323980892 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611570247934 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.669362681 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.166666667 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41666666667 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17471663462 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605919902506 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630582308135 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0855548417778 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543296137329 0.056905535591 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.