It is important to consider how to help the homeless people who are living on the streets miserably. Although some people believe that supporting them with money is the best possible solution, I disagree with this view. In my opinion, giving monetary help to the homeless would make the situation only worse as it has the chance to make them more dependent on people’s generosity.
Donating money to the homeless will do more harm than any good. This is because, it usually acts as an excuse for them to earn money through hardship, which might turn them into being more lazy and dependent. In other words, they would consider this as an easy opportunity to earn money and would likely to stay homeless forever rather than utilizing this money for their betterment. For instance, a vast majority of people living on the streets are capable of doing manual works, but instead of achieving money by working hard, they only want to live on donation. Moreover, if government decides to subsidize them, then the people, who are already struggling to make their ends meet, will abandon the hopes of becoming self-sufficient. Consequently, supporting them with money would have an adverse effect on these homeless people.
Apart from just giving money, there are other effective ways by which we can come in assistance of homeless peoples. One of them is to provide vocational training. The reason for this is that they would be able to gather experience by doing this, which would not only enable them to apply for a job but also give them the chance to buy a house with their hard-earned money. For example, Bangladesh government has undertaken a programme to give hand-on training on handy crafts and mechanics to unemployed people so that they can earn their livelihood after this course. Therefore, this action has been able to aid the homeless people to a great extent.
To conclude, it is not hard to see that giving financial benefits to homeless people do not help them in the long run.I think the better option would be to train them for making themselves useful instead of leeching on to other people’s support.
- An increasing number of people are buying what they want need online what are the advantages and disadvantages for both individuals and companies to shopping online 95
- The performance of staff can have a significant impact on the success of a company What can companies do to increase staff productivity 93
- More developing countries are given aid from international organizations to help them in their development plans Some people argue that financial aid is important but others suggest that practical aid and advice are more important Discuss both views and g 92
- Both government and individuals are spending too much money protecting animals and their habitat This money should be better spent dealing with fundamental issues in society such as poverty and health care To what extent do you agree 89
- It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife while there are other problems that are more important Do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 119, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
...people do not help them in the long run.I think the better option would be to tra...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, apart from, for example, for instance, i think, in my opinion, in other words, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1767.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88121546961 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55472893028 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530386740331 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5372147503 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.8 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1333333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386368912406 0.244688304435 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14208248003 0.084324248473 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727985218261 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284138124227 0.151304729494 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734546666067 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.