In most successful companies, some people think that communication between employers and workers is the most important factor. Other people say that other factors are more important. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
An essential skill set many people have to equip and sharpen in every workplace is verbal interaction between employees and leaders, who often question whether it is truly as necessary as the other skills or not. On one hand, I am inclined to believe that as an individual work at a large-scale company, he absolutely has to cement the long-standing relationship among heads of departments. On the other hand, hardly can we deny that there are more and more practical knowledge and useful skills which virtually the whole staff or leaders forgot to update.
To assess the essential advantages of friendly communication among members of the company, we must bring a boosted level of productivity into focus. Assuming a newbie was recruited at a multinational enterprise, he would be struggling to cope with the pressure from the unfamiliar working environment. In such a case, feeling sympathy from colleagues as well as acceptance from the seniors would be a therapeutic effect. Not only can an employee be supported whenever he is stuck with business problems, but some minor mistakes will also be averted. Another benefit of workplace communication is collecting and piecing together personal ideas and proposals from every single one, some of whom might be innovative even though they work in lower positions.
Although so far, one can readily draw the conclusion that all companies must try to attain effective communication, we must put the crucial elements of other skills into perspective before judging if one deserves more attention than the rest. Not having a comprehensive vision or fearless mindset, even the most communicative manager will hit the brick wall and the company will make no progress or even fall behind. For instance, once a leader or even a worker is able to have the capability of solving problems and developing strategies, the business corporation will have so many chances to progress toward profitable gains. On top of that, the workplace culture, along with the ability to integrate technologíes into conventional business practices, will dramatically affect the survival of all start-ups in this digital era.
Taking both sides into consideration, they point me to the conclusion that in principle, communicating is essential for the cooperation between managers and subordinates, but in practice, there are other factors at play. Quality such as innovation, risk-taking, and troubleshooting must be present among leaders in order to bring the businesses to another level.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-01 | Lanlanlanlan | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | Lanlanlanlan | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | Lanlanlanlan | 61 | view |
| 2021-10-19 | dqnghuy | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-09 | chocopieyogurt | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that a crime is a result of social problems and poverty, others think that crime is a result of a bad person’s nature. Discuss both these views and give your opinion? 84
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face to face contact with others Is this a positive or negative development 89
- Today different types of robots are developed which are good friends to us and help us both at home and work Is this a positive or negative development 94
- The pie charts below show the main reasons why students chose to study at a particular UK university in 1987 and 2007 78
- Directors and managers of organisations are often older people Some people say that it is better for younger people to be leaders To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, as to, for instance, such as, as well as, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2119.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 399.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31077694236 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09116349262 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598997493734 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 677.7 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.3828845161 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.357142857 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125946821375 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038582117853 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430461900006 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.075848698778 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296426347549 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.