In most universities students focus on specialised subjects, however some people believe that universities should encourage students to study a wider variety of subjects. To want extent you agree or disagree?
Some people say that university students should also pay interests in a variety of subjects rather than concentrate mainly on specialized ones. In my opinion, I do not accord with this idea.
The first reason is that these subjects do not relate to their chosen major. Studying these subjects, therefore, will not help to boost the academic skills and abilities that are actually helpful for students’ future career. In other words, the knowledge from these subjects is of complete futility to the students’ initial studying objects. For example, many IT students find it unreasonable when being forced to pass philosophy classes while the computer and coding skills are of paramount importance to their major.
The second reason for my objection is that learning these unrelated subjects is a total waste of time. While students indeed can study 16 hours a day or more, there are only a few hours that individuals can achieve the highest level of effectiveness in studying. Thus, they need to fully utilize this amount of time to acquire an in-depth understanding of their major’s subjects then relax to prepare for the upcoming lessons. In contrast, spending time on other subjects will only consume people’s effective time leading to a poor academic performance of their specialized training. Moreover, many students have to take a part-time job in order to pay their own expenses and, therefore, they are forced to cut down their studying time. This makes studying lessons which are not relevant to their major even more of a time-wasting concern.
In conclusion, I assert that people, especially those who do not go through university life, should never ask students to learn subjects which are unrelated to their main focus.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to major'
Suggestion: to major
... subjects do not relate to their chosen major. Studying these subjects, therefore, wi...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 167, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
...n subjects which are unrelated to their main focus.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, if, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2332155477 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82039898798 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586572438163 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3927275299 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.923076923 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4615384615 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164267603605 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603200707778 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651282415623 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123184573999 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459607730002 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.