The migration from the countryside to the urban areas for job opportunities is though to cause various problems in both places. To my way of thinking, the tendency which cause deleterious damage to the nature along with negatively affecting the life quality of citizens can be ameliorated with financial incentives and improved services in the rural areas.
To begin with, this movement can result in the gathering of the extremely many people in the cities, followed by the more traffic jams and noise which are considered as the most irritating features of urban areas for citizens. Furthermore, overpopulation in the cities can cause the lack of adequate housing, followed by the destruction of forests and natural environment in order to build more accommodation. In addition, the more people living in the city, the more transportation is being used. Correspondingly, more greenhouse gasses are being emitted to the atmosphere. Moreover, young people are thought to move to cities more than the senior parts of the public. Correspondingly, this tendency can leave less workforce for the agricultural works which can be arduous for the left elderly people.
It is crystal clear that improving work opportunities in the countryside is required in order to reduce the number of people leaving the villages. Governments can introduce financial incentives for encouraging entrepreneurs to commence their start-ups in the countryside. Moreover, poor infrastructure in the agricultural areas can be improved and accommodation prices can be decreased in order to attract more people. Enhanced education and health services can also contribute more people living in the agricultural areas.
To conclude, it is indubitable that the problem of such complexity has no solution which is likely to change the whole scenery in a very short period. However, I believe that incentives and boosted life quality in the rural areas can bring about the positive outcomes.
- The pie charts below give data on the spending and consumption of resources by countries of the world and how the population is distributed Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some people participate in extracurricular activities such as volunteering in charitable events or joining dance groups to gain more knowledge and experience others simply focus on their goals such as academic subjects or work which do you think helps in 89
- while recruiting a new employee the employer should pay more attention to their personal qualities rather than qualifications and experience To what extent do you agree or disagree give your opinion with relevant example 73
- Some people prefer hobbies that require technology while some people think that hobbies do notvrequire technology Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- Some people think that formal education should start for children as early as possible While others think that it should not start until 7 years of age discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, as for, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1654.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38762214984 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14413079681 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527687296417 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.023406611 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.142857143 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9285714286 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280712314557 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093104719173 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500075813516 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161384477974 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304457484608 0.056905535591 54% => OK
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.