ndividuals and countries cannot help everyone who needs help in the world, so they should only be concerned about their own communities and countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that the all monetary capital of the state should be directed to the population of the country because government cannot support everyone. While I agree that government ought to prioritize their own people, I also believe that they should help countries which are too poor to help themselves.
The main reason why government should focus on their own citizens first is that, without proper concern for its citizens, the government cannot support other countries. In other words, peace and harmony inside a country means that authorities can make time to support other countries. In other words, proper regulation and mutual understanding within the country provides the government with the opportunity to help other countries. For example, all huge and prosperous nations like US, United Kingdom, Germany, support their own citizens then help others. Moreover, if individuals did not supported by government it may suffer due to protests and resentments. To put another way, people may lose faith and protest against their elected government if they feel that their hard-earned tax money is being sent on helping other countries rather than leading to better facilities and services for them. For instance, recently, in the United States, the people rebelled because the state invested money in Afghanistan instead of helping its citizens.
On the flip side, I also feel countries should not turn their back to the other countries. First of all, due to the reason that by helping and financially supporting poor and corrupt countries, strong nations can maintain a harmonious atmosphere inside the country. That is, by helping their less weak neighbors, some countries can prevent various difficulties because if one country is impoverished, it will have an irrefutable effect on neighboring states. As an example, Russia protected Kazakhstan when they were in a state of collapse, therefore, it is safer to live there, and now both countries support each other. Besides, by helping larger countries in their difficult times, it is possible to earn their trust. As a result, when these strong nations recover, they can lend a helping hand in return.
In conclusion, I would like to reiterate that although countries should put their own citizens first, I also believe that they should try to help the deprived nations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-14 | samdilnura | 73 | view |
- share of total empoyment Camba District 1996 1999
- In many countries today there are concerns about the unhealthy lifestyles that people lead What health issues are linked to modern lifestyles What answers to these problems can you suggest 84
- Some people believe that smart phones are destroying social interaction today To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
- nowadays many people aim to create a balance between their work and other aspects of their life however only a few achieve it What are the problems in doing this and what solutions can you suggest 84
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than work for a company Do the benefits of being self employed outweigh the drawbacks 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 590, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'support'
Suggestion: support
...thers. Moreover, if individuals did not supported by government it may suffer due to prot...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1970.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26737967914 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71526137639 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51871657754 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3700393701 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.125 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299712044161 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115258226331 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705134902613 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224723541061 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374643932991 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.