In nearly all science courses at university, there are significantly more male students than female students. What is the reason for this? What could be done to balance out the numbers?
The number of students’ studying science-related subjects at universities is dominated by males. The primary reason behind this trend is the family rules laid on women and the solution to this problem is providing financial aid from government to women studying science courses.
Females do not opt for science-related subjects due to family restrictions. They play a pivotal role in raising children, in addition, they perform household chores such as cooking meals, washing clothes and cleaning houses. As, jobs related to science field demand lengthy period of work time, it won’t be possible for women to dedicate time to fulfill their family duties and rearing of their children. For example, In India, Time’s survey showed that, 45% of females studying in universities across the country choose non-science courses that would provide them time-flexible jobs.
The solution to increase the numbers of girls studying science-related subjects at universities is government providing financial help. Girls who undertook the subject at universities should be provided with scholarships, subsequently, this will motivate their families and other girls around them to take up the subject. Also, women without families working in science and technology sectors should receive tax benefits and women with families and children should not only receive tax benefits but free access to children day-care facilities. For instance, North Maharashtra University charges only 30% of its fees to girls opting science subjects, to raise their numbers.
To conclude, though family restrictions deter women from choosing science courses, governments can offer financial help to female students and workers related to science and technology department to motivate them and their families.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-15 | AlMightylord86 | 79 | view |
| 2019-06-25 | annasherry | 51 | view |
- Scientists have been warning for many years about importance of protecting the environment and that we mustlimit the use of energy in our daily lives. Despite warnings many people do not do this. What are the reasons andhow people can be encouraged to tak 89
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 78
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others however say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required Discuss both these views and give your 73
- Children nowadays spend a great deal of time watching television.However, television cannot replace the book as a learning tool, which is why children are less well-educated today. To what extent do you agree with this statement? 89
- Most high level positions in companies are filled by men even though the workforce in many developed countries is more than 50 per cent female Companies should be required to allocate a certain percentage of these positions to women To what extent do you 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 389, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lfill their family duties and rearing of their children. For example, In India, T...
^^
Line 3, column 587, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... would provide them time-flexible jobs. The solution to increase the numbers of ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 607, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...harashtra University charges only 30% of its fees to girls opting science subject...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, for example, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73308270677 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91601640534 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605263157895 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3466992236 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.636363636 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18403894233 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869742348238 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560725330259 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126223606483 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339726601735 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.