New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages

In today's modern society, the rapid development of sophisticated technologies has influenced numerous of facets our daily life, especially the way children enjoy their leisure time. However, as every coin has two sides, this problem also brings some pros and cons. I firmly believe that the benefits of modern technologies bringing to children overshadowed the drawbacks.
Admittedly, to some extent, it is evident that children nowadays are being affected negatively by the latest technologies. The majority of them now have their phone, which can be used for various personal purposes, especially for playing games. Consequently, they are more likely to get addicted to these fantasy games, and, be neglected from school work. In addition, these children tend to stay indoors, playing online games all day rather than going outside and doing some physical activities like playing sports. Moreover, because we can’t fully control all the resources on the Internet, children can easily access to many negative documents and toxic videos. If the parent cannot manage what their children are using and watching on the Internet, over time, they will be influenced negatively and then perform bad behaviors toward people around them accordingly.
However, it is reasonable to say that the positive side of the latest technologies has overwhelmed the negative one. High-tech devices are fantastic tools for educational purposes. For instance, during the Covid 19 pandemic, children cannot get access to school for learning and interacting with their friends. However, this issue was solved by using mobile phones to get involved in many Internet-based courses. With modern and highly qualified devices, children can also see their teacher over a screen and interact with their friends just like in the reality. Also, these wonderful tools can help children relax and develop intelligence by playing tactic games with their friends or widening their understanding of the world around them by surfing social media.
In conclusion, it is no doubt that new technologies can also be beneficial and detrimental to children. From my point of view, for those reasons I have made, I bitterly suppose that the positive can minor the negative one.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In todays modern society, the rapid deve...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o children overshadowed the drawbacks. Admittedly, to some extent, it is eviden...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 597, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntrol all the resources on the Internet, children can easily access to many negat...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...toward people around them accordingly. However, it is reasonable to say that th...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d around them by surfing social media. In conclusion, it is no doubt that new t...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, then, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1887.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39142857143 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75368250656 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9283608087 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5882352941 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82352941176 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190222165237 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601717916846 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488472526434 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121523325462 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021259755705 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In todays modern society, the rapid deve...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o children overshadowed the drawbacks. Admittedly, to some extent, it is eviden...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 597, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntrol all the resources on the Internet, children can easily access to many negat...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...toward people around them accordingly. However, it is reasonable to say that th...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d around them by surfing social media. In conclusion, it is no doubt that new t...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, then, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1887.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39142857143 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75368250656 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9283608087 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5882352941 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82352941176 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190222165237 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601717916846 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488472526434 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121523325462 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021259755705 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.