The given bar chart illustrates the amount of money that people in France and the UK spent on five different merchandise in 2010.
Overall, it can be seen clearly that the consumption of consumer stuff in 2010 was relatively similar in two different nations. Besides, evidently, cars could be regarded as the goods holding the highest expense in both France and UK. In addition, the minority of French had the tendency to consider cameras as worth buying, whereas in the UK, perfume accounted for the lowest figures.
Looking at the chart more closely, one can recognize that cars held the highest amount in France. Comprising about 400.000 pounds sterling (PS), the figure for cars in France is over 2 times higher than cameras. Cars were followed by computers, books, and perfume, which largely accounted for 370.000 PS, 300.000 PS, and 200.000 PS respectively. In contrast, the figure for cameras just hit the bottom of 150.000 PS, consistently being the merchandise spent the lowest in France.
On the other hand, a similar trend was also seen in the UK, while a significant number of people expensed on cars. The number of cars remarkably held over 450.000 PS, more than 50.000 PS of what it did in France. In addition, books which were also considered as the worth-spending goods comprised approximately 410.00 PS. Besides, computers and cameras held a relatively large amount of expenditure, about 350.000 PS and 360.00 PS in the given order. In controversy, in the UK, people were not interested in buying perfume, making it become the category consumed the least in all goods, accounting for almost 140.000 PS.
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- the graph below shows the number of enquiries received by Tourist Information Office in one city a six month period in 2011 89
- The line graph below gives information about the rates of unemployment between 1991 and 2005 in three different countries in Europe The table shows the percentage of men and women in the workforce in these three countries 73
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 479, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...merchandise spent the lowest in France. On the other hand, a similar trend was a...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, look, so, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1355.0 965.302439024 140% => OK
No of words: 270.0 196.424390244 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01851851852 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70589713158 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 106.607317073 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548148148148 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 283.868780488 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.0236546505 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.230769231 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0756348064894 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.033422664274 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452312279418 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0645639823148 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419263464867 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.