News media has become more influential in people's lives. Others believe it is a negative development. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
With the rapid development of the digital era, newspapers and television channels that reporting current affairs are powerful among the public. Some people argue that this progress is a bad influence on society. This essay will argue why I completely disagree with this statement.
News channels have influenced society in many positive ways. To begin with, the press has provided news reliable and informative in up-to-the-minute which are leading the public to realize the newest affairs around the world. This leads the public to feel a sense of belonging to the global village. Secondly, the media is working as a bridge between the government and the people. Although most of the folks have never met administrators and the president, they could have access to knowledge through watching TV or reading newspapers to understand the policy or update from the government. Furthermore, media played an important role in the multicultural development which helps people to have a great understanding between nations. Thus, by far without this developed media people can just know a few about this world.
On the other hand, the privacy of celebrities and the contents of some media are a trend to a negative development. Some journalists are more likely to expose the celebrities’ privacy to meet people’ circuity which sometimes impacts the celebrity’s daily life. However, from my point of the view, as a public person that taking a super salary have to access this sort of risk. In term of the contents of some media which include violent and sexual images have complained that have a significantly negative influence on children. From my counter-argument of this statement, with recent technology, such images are totally avoidable if they do not want to see them.
In conclusion, although there are two different voices about news channels, the importance of new media outweigh the disadvantage of some minor issues. Personally, I strongly agree with the increasingly powerful news channels is a positive development.
- the two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Many people do not fee safe either at home or when they out. What are the causes and what can be done to solve this. 78
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, California and the rest of the world. 73
- Multicultural societies where people of different groups live together can bring more benefits than drawbacks to a country To what extent do you agree and disagree 67
- More and more people buy and use their own car Do you think the advantages of this trend for individuals overweigh the disadvantages for the environment 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, in conclusion, sort of, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1732.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34567901235 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08992856105 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567901234568 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2521153909 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.882352941 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0588235294 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146588329044 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490841773815 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449613130514 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0888885432611 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343728097824 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.