Not so many people use a bicycle although it has many benefits. Why? How to encourage people to use bicycles as a main transport?
Despite salutary effects of using a bicycle, there is still unpopularity of this means of transportation among many individuals. The reasons for this issue are varied and some feasible solutions would be proposed in the paragraphs below.
There are two main underlying explanations for the uncommon use of bicycles. First, since there is an increasing number of individuals adopting a hectic lifestyle, cycling would be deemed as impractical as it would take them a considerable amount of time to commute to work. Second, modern people are less concerned about the emission from their motorcycles or cars that undoubtedly inflict severe damage to our fragile environment. Those are the reasons for the weak presence of bicycles in human society.
Several measures can be taken to improve the popularity of this pedal-driven recreational vehicle. The first pragmatic solution may be to raise the price of petrol or levy a heavy tax on cars and motorbikes. This action will make it more costly to own or use a car or a motorbike. Another efficient method is to introduce monthly green days that by law require everyone to cycle to work to get them involved in protecting the environment. Moreover, with the help of various means of media, effective propagation may be launched to raise people’s awareness of the harmful effects of motorbikes and cars on the environment. As a result, people will gradually form a habit of using bikes for their daily commutes. The last approach may be to build more lanes only for bikes to make it safer for cyclists to travel on the road.
In conclusion, cycling, despite its beneficial effects, still remains a rare picture in the modern world. There are a number of reasons for its unpopularity, therefore; realistic solutions need to be adopted to promote this eco-friendly means of transportation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-28 | minhlamnguyen1204 | 73 | view |
- Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Not so many people use a bicycle although it has many benefits. Why? How to encourage people to use bicycles as a main transport? 78
- Traffic and accommodation problems are increasing and government should encourage some businesses to move from cities to rural areas. Does advantage outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- Not so many people use a bicycle although it has many benefits. Why? How to encourage people to use bicycles as a main transport? 56
- The best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic congestion is providing free public transport in 24 hours per day, and seven days a week.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s eco-friendly means of transportation.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, moreover, second, so, still, therefore, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11842105263 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00460605545 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585526315789 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7768218383 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.733333333 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125210085334 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0450216457034 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564540596612 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0735111256017 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453451075299 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.