Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Today’s governments are intensifying efforts to mitigate pressing problems related to traffic. Some hold a belief that the pragmatic solution to curb traffic jams is to build more broad roads, whereas others argue that it is better to pour money into constructing train and underground railways. Although the former seems to have a positive effect on reducing traffic congestion, I firmly believe that the latter is a more practical method to tackle the issue effectively.
On the one hand, it can be clearly seen that building and expanding roads cost less money when compared with the construction of more train and subway tracks. This is because governments do not have to squander taxpayers’ money into the expenditure of railway infrastructure. Moreover, with mass production of vehicles, an increasing number of private transport must be the cause for massive congestion bottlenecks in some countries. This is the reason why road extension may be the key to alleviating traffic density in areas with inadequate road and highway facilities, especially at peak hours.
On the other hand, there is little question that constructing more railroads and underground tunnels would be a more effective measure to ease traffic congestion. The reason is that the expansion of railway and subway systems will certainly reduce tremendous pressure on transport infrastructure due to the reduction of traffic volume. As a result, this will help ease traffic flow, which will increase living standards of citizens. Moreover, in the long run, this approach will have a positive effect on the public perception of train and subway lines, which will lead to the increase in the amount of rapid transit. In the end, the decline in exhaust emissions of vehicles may lessen the effects of global warming.
In conclusion, while the building of widened streets seems to have some obvious advantages, I am sure that investing in expanding train and underground networks is a more pragmatic solution to the traffic jam problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | Thang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | happyhappy | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | MOHETH CHOWDARI | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | Lynn2309 | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | Dao Thu Ha | 73 | view |
- Not so many people use a bicycle although it has many benefits. Why? How to encourage people to use bicycles as a main transport? 78
- The best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic congestion is providing free public transport in 24 hours per day, and seven days a week.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Not so many people use a bicycle although it has many benefits. Why? How to encourage people to use bicycles as a main transport? 56
- Traffic and accommodation problems are increasing and government should encourage some businesses to move from cities to rural areas. Does advantage outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 219, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ic solution to the traffic jam problem.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, moreover, so, whereas, while, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30434782609 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95519699952 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55900621118 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8020380779 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.384615385 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7692307692 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287883450295 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951461367298 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628817794864 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176333041012 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688631173033 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.