now a days more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face to face it is a positive or a negative development

Due to the development of the technology, more and more people tend to communicate online instead of meeting face to face. Although this gives convenience when communicating, it is also a problem that many people have to deal with.

There is no doubt that people benefit a lot when they socialize online. This way of socializing is normally considered as an easy connectivity from every place in the world. People can keep in touch with their relatives or friends who live far away easily without having to wait for a long time to receive responses. Moreover, this also has a significant role to play in saving time and money. Obviously that buying a computer or a smartphone for long-term use will absolutely cost less than spending time to commute to the rendezvous or money for transportation if you do not have a private one.

On the other hand, communicating online also has some disadvantages. This literally make people become more passive since people will take that as an excuse for not meeting others. As a consequence, they will not be bothered to talk to anyone and soon be isolated from the world. In addition, if online socializing help people communicate without a hitch, it can gradually destroy the relationships as well. For instance, you have a really bad row with your best friend and you just literally talk about it via messages or a phone call. By this way, that person is unable to know your true feelings or whether you are serious with the conversation or not, which might lead to misunderstandings throughout the conversation and the problem is unsolvable.

In conclusion, there are several ways to communicate with other people. Online socializing is a good one, however, people need to be oblivious and understand its true benefits but not misuse it for bad purposes.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, really, so, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90196078431 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93960742461 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578431372549 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5782417047 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184103611882 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649536370756 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0947984234018 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132687256016 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0917961504578 0.056905535591 161% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.