NOWADAYS, ALL OVER THE WORLD, PEOPLE SHARE THE SAME FASHIONS, ADVERTISING, BRANDS, EATING HABITS AND TV CHANNELS SINCE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN COUNTRIES BECOME LESS EVIDENT EACH YEAR. WHAT ARE THE REASONS? DO THE ADVANTAGES OUTWEIGH THE DISADVANTAGES OF THIS?
Thanks to the globalization in the recent decades, the cultural gaps between nations have been bridged significantly. With a better mutual understanding, citizens are no longer difficult to adopt the unique aspects of the foreign cultures such as eating habits, fashion trend or interior decorations. In my point of view, the benefits of global integration do outnumber the demerits due to several reasons.
To begin with, there are some striking disadvantages of this trend that we should be concerned about. Firstly, there is a spread of cross-cultural materialistic lifestyle and attitude which may deprive us of humanity and generosity. For instance, the role of TV advertisements in most of the cases is related to the concept of materialism. This phenomenon is demonstrated in other cultures and the net global result tends to reinforce the terminal materialism that buying is for the frivolous purposes instead of seeking for the fundamental requirements. Moreover, the aggressive spread of market economies and communication technology poses a threat to the existence of local cultures and values. The West has endeavored to undermine their cultural heritage by imposing thief religion and policies. The true identity and culture are in jeopardy with the influence of alien cultures since youngsters nowadays pay less attention to their history and tradition while gaining more preoccupation with machine-centric life.
On the other hand, sharing the similar traditions and using the global fashion brands probably bring some major advantages. To clarify, Highland Coffee, which is a prominent coffee chain, has grown incessantly to a thousand shops in approximately sixty nations. Besides, global integration has facilitated several brands to sell product and gain access to potential customers all around the world. Several identical stores serve clothes that are prevalent to millions of individuals, from dresses, jeans to T-shirts in Tokyo, Paris or even the developing regions like Hanoi. People are free to enjoy their gown, eating habits and other aspects of diverse universal specialties served in their countries. The more vigorous the bonds among people are, the more mutual understanding will be enhanced, thereby helping us maintaining the peace of the world.
In conclusion, international integration is inevitable and this trend should be supported on account of its long-term benefits on the development of society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-04 | lonbimthoi | 89 | view |
- Some people hold that nature places a more important role in people development. However, others believe nurture is the decisive factor. Discuss both views, give opinions. 90
- SOME PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT SUCCESS IS ABOUT HARD WORK AND DETERMINATION. OTHERS THINKS THAT SUCCESS HAS A CONNECTION WITH MONEY AND PERSONAL APPERANCE. DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS, GIVE YOUR OPINION AND SOME OF YOUR OWN EXPERIENCE 89
- SOME PEOPLE THINK MEDICAL CARE SHOULD BE FREE FOR EVERYONE, WHILE OTHER THINK THEY SHOULD PAY MEDICAL COST FOR THEMSELVES. DISCUSS BOTH VIEW AND GIVE YOUR OPINION. 84
- ALL METHODS USED IN ADVERTISING ARE UNETHICAL AND UNACCEPTABLE IN TODAY S SOCIETY TO WHAT EXTENT DO YOU AGREE WITH THIS VIEW 95
- Global environmental issues are the responsibility of rich nations, not of poorer nations. Do you agree with this opinion? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 818, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to maintain' or 'maintain'.
Suggestion: to maintain; maintain
...ng will be enhanced, thereby helping us maintaining the peace of the world. In conclusio...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2079.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58870967742 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10481310793 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618279569892 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4814635557 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.294117647 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8823529412 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35294117647 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0906844405932 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0254486821687 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0210178244995 0.0667982634062 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0470527407426 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018520677788 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 78.4519038076 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.