Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is undoubtedly true that animal testing has become one of the most controversial topics among public. While many people argued that animal experimenting is morally wrong, the opponents said it necessary to the development of humanity. Personally, I believed that limited animal experimentation may be acceptable
On the one hand, there are clear ethical arguments against animal testing. It appears to be shreds of evidence that supporters of this statement believed that all creatures around the world are equal. None of them should be suffered for other's welfare. By way of illustration, the albino mice or laboratory mice are at risk of being sick for the purpose of measuring the effectiveness of new drugs or medical treatments.
Nevertheless, many people claimed that the experiment on animal is just a necessary evil for a greater good. This is shown by a huge amount of people who are free from dreadful diseases or even death due to cutting-edge medicines. According to them, these incredible gifts would not be possible without animal testing. Furthermore, major of the scientists allegedly researched without harm the guinea pigs and strive their best to find good treatment to them
In my point of view, the studies in animals within the permissible limit may be acceptable. There is every likelihood that the advantages which animal testing brings to human health should not be underestimated. Nonetheless, these species tested need to be deliberated before proceeding to brings it down to the minimum. I strongly believe that the lives of all creatures should be respected and these experiments should only be done until the scientists find an alternative method of research
To summarize, there is two opposite view about the use of animal with the aim of curing people. From my perspective, scientists can experiments with the animal as long as it is in the permissible scale
- What are the possible effects of living long on an individual and on the whole society 83
- Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activity Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sports. Why is it? Is it a positive or negative development? 78
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 57
- Many animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea What are the reasons for this and what can be doen to solve this issue 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ity. Personally, I believed that limited animal experimentation may be acceptable...
^^
Line 13, column 291, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'bring'.
Suggestion: bring
... to be deliberated before proceeding to brings it down to the minimum. I strongly beli...
^^^^^^
Line 17, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s long as it is in the permissible scale
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1610.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22727272727 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00918332173 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0563218958 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339273902 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114470863396 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750781462065 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176400214307 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637499583422 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.