Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glomour and weath than for their achievemnets, and this sets a bad example to young people. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
In today’s fast-changing world, well-known celebrities play an important role in entertaining and influencing society and community. Thus, several individuals acquiesced that depict how the level of famous people’s richness is, it will spoil the young generation’s perception. While it is true to some extent, I still disagree with this perspective and I will discuss the main explanation in this essay below.
On the one hand, exhibiting affluence of famous celebrities can harm to younger generation. It is obviously true that younger people, who are in the coming-of-age stage, desire to discover the new and are prone to imitate other’s behaviors and personal favorites. When these younger idolized admirers follow their celebrities, for example, will purchase several exorbitant identical items with their idols even though they cannot afford to pay the bill. This is because they desire to show their passion and look like their idols, which can presumably lead to a worse extravagant habit in young individuals.
On the other hand, occasionally showing prosperity seems to be significant to the youth. Indeed, to reach a successful career path and become a millionaire person, several celebrities have sacrificed their youth and taken advantage of their talents to show publicly. Besides, several younger people who want to enrich themselves, have considered their idols as motivation and inspiration to evolve. Therefore, showing the richness into social media does not seem worse, in contrast, it can assist in motivating the younger.
In conclusion, although it can cause a potentially detrimental personality trait for the youth if they imitate and try to pursue their stars’ glamour, I still believe that it can be seen as a positive incentive for them.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-08-23 | thaokim2003 | 78 | view |
- We all work or will work in our jobs with many different kind of people In your opinion what are some important characteristics of a co worker 61
- Some people think goverments should spend mowney on measures to save languages with few speaker form duying out completely Others think that this is a waste of financial resources Discuss these both views and give your opinion 78
- Nowadays not enough students choose science subjects in university in many countries What are the reasons for this problem What are the effects on society 84
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fe 89
- Many adults nowadays prefer spending their free time playing computer games Why do they do this Is this a positive or negative development 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 42, Rule ID: FAMOUS_CELEBRITY[1]
Message: Use simply 'celebrities'.
Suggestion: celebrities
...n the one hand, exhibiting affluence of famous celebrities can harm to younger generation. It is o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, look, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45289855072 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01530045966 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626811594203 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4123976778 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.416666667 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8333333333 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205468225981 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675535341248 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483913563767 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118641371507 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256610385626 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 42, Rule ID: FAMOUS_CELEBRITY[1]
Message: Use simply 'celebrities'.
Suggestion: celebrities
...n the one hand, exhibiting affluence of famous celebrities can harm to younger generation. It is o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, look, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45289855072 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01530045966 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626811594203 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4123976778 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.416666667 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8333333333 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205468225981 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675535341248 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483913563767 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118641371507 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256610385626 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.