Nowadays employment options are changing and employees cannot rely on having the same job and working condition throughout their life. What are some possible causes? Suggests some ways to plan for the future under these circumstances.
It is hard to deny that, the world is changing at a swift speed. The norms have drastically changed in very field along with corporate world. In past employment options were still and people have done a single job throughout their life. However, the standard has completely changed. Reasons for such phenomenon and possible solution, which one can adapt, are explained in the ensuing paragraph.
To begin with, due to inflation and over growing competition market is unstable for companies. Therefore, tobe financially stable, such companies give lay offs to personal in unfavourable circumstances. In addition, the working culture is also constantly changing. Due to state-of-the art-technology, companies incorporate new methods and working style to keep an upper hand in the market. In turn, some employees find it difficult to adjust.
There are some precautionary measures, which employees can take to be ready for any situation. Firstly, all the apprentices should be gloomy. This is because in situation like layoff or learning a new technology, workers,can keep themselves ready. By being distrustful one less susceptible to mental stress and can apply for a new job without any delay. Secondly, one must have adaptive nature. This is due to the fact that today, companies constantly induce their personnel to learn new procedures and method to make operation smooth and flawless. This nature will also help in adjusting to a new job.
To conclude, I pen down by retreating that the employees have to keep themselves ready for any corporate situation. Competitive world and avail of state of the art technology has utterly changed the employment options. However, gloomy nature and adaptive nature are elixirs for workers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-13 | Skaur123@gmail.com | 79 | view |
- Some employers reward member of staff for the exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an intcentive impact on others. To what extent is this style of management effective?are there better ways of encour 56
- Homeschooling belongs to the past and is unacceptable in the modern society .what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 70
- Homeschooling belongs to the past and is unacceptable in modern society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Use your own knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence 56
- The line graph below changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975to 2000. 78
- The diagram show a structure that is used to generate electricity from wave power. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 29, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...djust. There are some precautionary measures, which employees can take to be...
^^
Line 9, column 222, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , can
...ff or learning a new technology, workers,can keep themselves ready. By being distrus...
^^^^
Line 13, column 148, Rule ID: STATE_OF_THE_ART[1]
Message: Did you mean 'state-of-the-art'?
Suggestion: state-of-the-art
...tuation. Competitive world and avail of state of the art technology has utterly changed the empl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34909090909 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95535037987 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621818181818 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1935009563 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.55 106.682146367 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.75 20.7667163134 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196637256824 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533405708812 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515825025589 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115641785395 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369946233244 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.