Nowadays human being has changed their attitude towards the nature. They became careless about the wealth of nature which is limited.
Nowadays human being has changed their attitude towards the nature. They became careless about the wealth of nature which is limited. Let me prove it in this essay.
In my point of view, I can say that the people’s carelessness has been happening for 2-3 centuries but mostly it has become so in 21st century because of the industrialization and equipment in every sphere therefore we can do everything with stocks of the nature which are not eternal. As we know that the resources of the nature are necessary for our beings. For example, the fresh water is critically little for us and it is becoming less day by day. In spite of that current generation are not going to stop wasting it due to they do not have the imagination about bad subsequences in the future that is why I call everyone upon to appreciate our nature resources because if we do not do, it will become catastrophically bad for humans.
There are the disasters which might be happened in the future because of the non-respecting attitude towards the power of the nature. Firstly, in terms of natural catastrophes they are earthquake, flood, eruption the possibility of occurring them is related to activity of digging up location in order to get minerals for future using. Secondly, I would like to talk about the manufactural disasters and which might happen by creating factories and fabrics. They have bad and harmful effect to atmosphere and to environment because they excrete a lot of gasses and litters to rivers from where we drink water so after throwing dumps, they get dirty and we cannot drink it anymore.
To conclude everything, I surely can say that if we do not reduce our temptations, we will live in the world of nothing beside rubbish but as I said it really depends on us. I hope that we will do everything useful for the new and present generation.
- The bar chart gives information about the number of library books borrowed from Lammertown Public Library in 1991 and 2001 and the pie chart gives information about the library's membership in 2010 78
- A number of tertiary course requirestudent to undertake a period of unpaidwork at an institution or organisation aspart of their programme. 78
- Due to the increasing density of living areas in a city, most residents are suffering from physical and social dangers. Consequently, they are against living in the city. 73
- The bar chart gives information about the number of library books borrowed from Lammertown Public Library in 1991 and 2001 and the pie chart gives information about the library's membership in 2010 78
- The bar chart gives information about the number of library books borrowed from Lammertown Public Library in 1991 and 2001 and the pie chart gives information about the library's membership in 2010 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ful for the new and present generation.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7399380805 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82155979317 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544891640867 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.0647426968 49.4020404114 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.769230769 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8461538462 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294397680054 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134366934426 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.197365254827 0.0667982634062 295% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261601939084 0.151304729494 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.309543182461 0.056905535591 544% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.