In days of yore, household chores were considered to be women’s duty, so people took it for granted that women had to do all the housework without any assistance from other members, particularly their husbands. However, with a surge of full-time women in the workforce, some people, especially feminists, start to problematize and challenge this gender-biased concept, suggesting that men and women should equally share household chores. As far as I am concerned, I completely agree with this egalitarian belief to a large extent for two reasons.
To begin with, it is unfair to impose the burden of all housework on women, for their roles in modern society have changed tremendously over the years. No longer are women confined to the traditional role of doing all maid-like drudgery at home. Since it is difficult for a single wage-earner to support a family, the majority of women today have sought full-time jobs to supplement their household income. Just like their fathers or husbands, women devote most of their time to their work during the daytime and suffer from considerably higher levels of work-related stress and anxiety; therefore, they deserve proper rest after a day’s hard work as men do. Nevertheless, if these career women are heavily burdened with the housework tasks after work, they might be overwhelmed with fatigue and stress, eventually compromising their physical and mental health.
In addition, splitting household duties evenly can successfully create a gender-equal environment with a strong emphasis on mutual support and respect. For example, if parents share housework responsibilities, they are able to convey two important messages to their children. First, women or mothers are not synonymous with housework. It is incumbent upon each family member to do the household chores with no one being exempt from this family duty. Second, sharing housework tasks is a way to show our love and care to our beloved family. By helping his wife do the dishes, a husband can let her know how much he loves her. Similarly, a boy can show his care to his mother or sister by helping them do the laundry. Since sharing housework can help build a healthy marital relationship and strengthen the bonding among family members, it is justifiable to argue that men and women should share housework equally.
In conclusion, gone are the days when housework is put on women’s shoulders. Nowadays, each member of the family should take part in doing housework. Equal division of household chores not only reduces the burden for women but also helps promote gender equality. Hence, it is reasonable for both genders to share housework.
- Schools should ask students to evaluate their teachers. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 89
- It is a common aspiration among many young people to run their own business. Rather than work for an employer.Do you think the advantages of working for yourself overweigh the drawbacks? 89
- The diagram below shows the process of recycling glass bottles 89
- All the people in a company should be treated equally and provided with the same numbers of vacations in a year To what extent do you agree or disagree 100
- The line graph shows the details of the U S Energy Consumption by different fuel types from the year 1980 to 2030 Summarise the given chart with important details and their features 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, similarly, so, then, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2235.0 1615.20841683 138% => OK
No of words: 432.0 315.596192385 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17361111111 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85691946189 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 176.041082164 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578703703704 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 701.1 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0012715378 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.75 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143694327526 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480288831003 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0257356914984 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0911417711477 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285937629286 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.