Nowadays, more and more jobs and tasks are done by machines which involves hard physical work. Do these positive of trend outweigh the negative effects?
Over the past decades, technology-associated have never ceased to draw a public attention and provoke debates. It is universally acknowledged that a rising number of works are addressed by machines. In my opinion, this trend could have both positive and negative impact in equal measure.
On the one hand, the trend that an increasing range of modern equipment s are taking place of carrying out manual jobs could bring several possible benefits for individual and business. On an individual level, this trend is likely to support people in dealing the potential dangerous jobs. The employments, for example, working in the companies which have pollutant surrounding, its could pose detrimental effects on their health. Thereby, robot is an appropriate machine to do this jobs. From a business perspective, the trend that the number of tasks are done by the power of instruments is contributes to increase the speed of production and creates a huge profit.
On the other hand, the above-mentioned arguments can be considered from the opposite angle. The first and foremost disadvantage is that the rate of unemployment could be grew. The industries, for instance, transforming the labors to machines by dismiss them since they could not enable to work productivity rather than machines. As a consequence, the worker become as an unemployment. Another drawback worth noting is in an event of the appearance of technical failures of detailed machine in plants can give rise to the mass error of the entire manufacturing chain, and therefore triggering the massive financial losses in the business.
In conclusion, it appears to me that the replacement of the workers by the tools at work place could impose both equally beneficial and detrimental implications. While this trend could aid employments in avoiding the unforeseen harmful jobs and creating the significant productivity and large gain, it is likely to grow up the percentage of unemployment and trigger the budgets of the companies resulted in the unexpected failures of the machines.
- In many countries people like to eat a wider variety of food than can be grown in their local area As a result much of the food people eat today has to come from other regions Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- In many countries people like to eat a wider variety of food than can be grown in their local area As a result much of the food people eat today has to come from other regions Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- Nowadays more and more jobs and tasks are done by machines which involves hard physical work Do these positive of trend outweigh the negative effects 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 380, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...anies which have pollutant surrounding, its could pose detrimental effects on their...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1730.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30674846626 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1735645436 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573619631902 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.7336713987 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.333333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140475181252 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043301084337 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352154180107 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0795124866231 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406385177025 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.