Nowadays, more and more older people who need employment compete with the younger people for the same jobs. What problems this causes? What are solutions?
It is widely acknowledged that there is a high level of competitiveness between young and old job seekers in the market. While this trend could trigger some issues, a number of viable solutions could be adopted to tackle them.
Job competition between the young and the old could cause some pressing troubles for individuals and the community. One of them could be that it would increase the unemployment rate among young adults, especially when vying for managerial positions. This is due to the fact that employers are often partial to veterans who are far more seasoned have visionary leadership which young workers do not possess, rendering them unable to secure a high-level post. FPT, one of the leading brands in Vietnam, perfectly exemplifies the situation. Most of its executives and directors are reported to be above 40 and have had decades of experience working for the corporation. Low-level vacancies may provide an opportunity for the youth, whereas they still have to compete with one another. Since the number of jobs is finite, some would find themselves jobless, leading to the same outcome.
Given the aforementioned setbacks, it is highly recommended that governments employ
several remedies to rectify them. One of the effective solutions is to encourage senior workers to provide both on-site and off-site mentoring and training for the junior. This move could be favorable because working with these experts would give them tremendous experience and sharpen their working skills. Vietnamese conglomerates, for example, Viettel, often see superior officers work with assistants who are usually fresh graduates. This is a boon to the inexperienced employees, as it may help them climb higher in the corporate ladder.
In conclusion, employment competition between generations could result in some issues, yet there would be a number of feasible methods to solve the problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-22 | truognchinh | 84 | view |
| 2018-11-22 | truognchinh | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-22 | truognchinh | 73 | view |
| 2018-09-30 | danial08cse | 84 | view |
| 2018-08-05 | hoanglinhhus | 56 | view |
- Pie chart 61
- Nowadays, more and more older people who need employment compete with the younger people for the same jobs. What problems this causes? What are solutions? 84
- It is generally discussed among the public that extreme sports such as skydiving and rock-climbing should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- Nowadays, more and more older people who need employment compete with the younger people for the same jobs. What problems this causes? What are solutions? 56
- It is not necessary to travel to other places to learn the culture of other people. We can learn just as much from books, films and the internet. Do you agree or disagree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, still, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38333333333 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90225008494 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593333333333 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2318968544 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.666666667 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13333333333 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132918658829 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0417603148646 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0281772232959 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0627442475477 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370582430746 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.