Nowadays more and more people who need employment have to compete with younger people for the same jobs What problems does this cause What are the solutions

Essay topics:

Nowadays, more and more people who need employment have to compete with younger people for the same jobs ? What problems does this cause? What are the solutions?

In today’s world, there are many older generations who need to secure jobs but have to compete with young adolescents. From my perspective, these problems are due to unequal opportunities and financial struggles. This essay will explore primary reasons behind this trend and proposed solutions to mitigate the issue.
There are several causes contributing to older people's employment having to compete with younger people. From one standpoint, there are many companies that require young adolescents because they are believed to equalize working opportunities among young people regardless of their background family, while older people always have mental and physical health problems, thereby they believe it would have less input to develop important areas in the workplace. In addition, the fewer adults working than younger people because they have to compete with the younger generation because the owners think that their skilled and knowledgeable human capital is not impressive and not enough to work, which promotes an un-egalitarian society.Second, there are more younger employees would result in a higher supply of highly qualified workers, which benefits society in the long run. For instance, the newspaper “ Worker Life” in 2024 that provided more evidence about the less privileged older people and that they need to live in poverty because of not finding a job and not getting an equal pension.
To address the issue, I suppose the government and education play an important role. Firstly, the government should have stricter regulations for companies that need to have a fair amount of working for everyone, while not depending on their ages. Secondly, educating the public, especially for adults to gain new knowledge and experience, which they are highlighting the edge held by older employees. Thirdly, the authorities or companies should have a training program for elderly to grow their talent and pay salaries with their hard-work. For example, Vietnam is not the wealthiest country but they always rank high on employees and also have an office to offer people secure a better job, while not focusing on ages. As a result, adding great benefits to nations and staff applications and potentially saving time, these older people could spend their tim on suitable career paths. In fact, it is acknowledged that skilled and knowledgeable human capital is imperative to foster economic growth and technological development in any nation.
In conclusion, the increase in competition between young and older people to get a job is largely driven by determination by modern lifestyle and unfairness in terms of conditions in the workplace. However, with efforts from the authorities and netizens, this problem can be reduced through regulations, education and changes in personal behavior.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2025-06-20 Trần Ánh Vy 73 view
2023-11-26 Ngoc21 73 view
2015-04-19 supbro119 80 view
Essays by user Trần Ánh Vy :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 752, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'younger' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: younger
...n-egalitarian society.Second, there are more younger employees would result in a higher supp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 23, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...n equal pension. To address the issue, I suppose the government and education pl...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, for example, for instance, i suppose, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2380.0 1615.20841683 147% => OK
No of words: 438.0 315.596192385 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43378995434 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85188971606 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552511415525 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 738.0 506.74238477 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.763086631 49.4020404114 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.75 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.375 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6875 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297413155739 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944343064527 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757007619007 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169314398512 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573773340163 0.056905535591 101% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 78.4519038076 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.