Nowadays, most large companies operate multi-nationally. To what extent those companies should have a responsibility towards local communities in which they operate?
In recent decades, there has been a growing trend of offshore expansion by large companies, thanks to globalization. Although multinational corporations create jobs for local people, their responsibility towards local communities should be at the highest level.
It is true that responsible corporate behavior contributes to broad-based benefits for the countries in which the companies are active. First, foreign companies should be responsible for the environment of the region. For example, if these companies take steps to dispose of waste properly, local people can enjoy new products without any concern for the environment. Second, multinational companies should be more active in charitable activities because that would give them an opportunity to save more lives overseas. In fact, many regions in which these companies operate do not have access to resources to deal with problems like hunger and poverty.
Another compelling reason is that foreign companies can substantially benefit from being socially responsible. Companies, especially in the manufacturing and mining industries, actively protecting the environment, can ensure their sustainable long-term growth. In fact, the media has revealed many instances of companies being taken away from social licenses due to the imprudence towards the environment. In addition, multinational corporations should be very conscious of their track records when it comes
to local responsibility as these are directly tied to brand names. If brand names are properly maintained and enhanced, sales and profits will be poised to increase as companies will be receiving more support from both local customers and the government.
In conclusion, the bar for corporate responsibilities towards local communities should always be high. This benefits not only the countries in which companies operate but the companies themselves.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-07-07 | Dat Tran Van | 61 | view |
- The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicine Government funding should reflect this To what extent do you agree 61
- The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicine Government funding should reflect this To what extent do you agree 61
- The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicine Government funding should reflect this To what extent do you agree 61
- Nowadays most large companies operate multi nationally To what extent those companies should have a responsibility towards local communities in which they operate 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.82310469314 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16950239244 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599277978339 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.5068019094 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.214285714 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29150053927 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111191070427 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717613326632 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181705860966 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100412623632 0.056905535591 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.