Nowadays, most people try to balance work and other aspects of their life. Unfortunately, not many people achieve this balance.
What problem does this cause?
Can you suggest some solutions to this issue?
It is obvious that work is the most crucial part in a person’s life as most of a person’s time is spent on this aspect. However, other commitments also contribute to their overall well-being. Therefore, there is a dire need to strike the balance between work and these parts, which is hardly attained by the majority of people. A number of reasons and solutions will be put forwards in this essay.
Regarding the culprits for this knotty problem, heavy workload and poor time management are among the most serious. Firstly, people who are most prone to this issue are often those who work for big corporations in which the amount of work is almost always overwhelming. Statistics show that many employees working for multinational companies often find themselves stuck at work way later than the time they are expected to finish work. A further contributing factor is the workers’ insufficient skill in managing their work schedules. This is usually the case among young new staff as they may not be familiar with the company’s operational routines and have not acquired adequate know-how for the job. For example, a new teacher in their first years of teaching usually allocate much of their time at the workstation preparing lesson plans, making props for their lessons. Only these simple tasks can take up much of their free time and leave out too little time for family and other aspects of life which are of no less importance.
It is, therefore, imperative for measures to combat this matter to be taken. One viable solution is for employees to prioritize the commitments in their life. What this means is if they value family more, they must choose the kind of job that they can do well with the least time possible. This usually equates doing a job that may not be their best choice. As for the second concern, should new workers in an organization do part-time jobs, go on work experience placements during their time at university, they will be able to adapt to new working environments with no problems. Besides, there should be support available to them when they are stuck. If these initiatives were taken by employers and senior colleagues alike, this situation could be reversed and people can reduce the time they spend on work and as a result, work-life balance can be ameliorated.
In summary, there are a myriad of reasons for this thorny issue but top among those are intimidating amounts of work and ill management skill. However, with support and good preparation for the part of the employees, this problem can be lessened.
- Some say that sports play an important role in the development of society Others think it is nothing more than a leisure activity Discuss both views and give your opinion 11
- Large businesses have big budgets for marketing and promotion and as a result people gravitate towards buying their products What problems does this cause What could be done to encourage to buy local products 80
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Competitiveness is a positive quality for people in most society How does this quality affect each individual and is it a positive or negative trend 73
- Organized tours to remote areas and communities are increasingly popular Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and the environment 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 606, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'supported'?
Suggestion: supported
...h no problems. Besides, there should be support available to them when they are stuck. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 25, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
... ameliorated. In summary, there are a myriad of reasons for this thorny issue but to...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, regarding, second, so, therefore, well, as for, for example, in summary, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 13.1623246493 228% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2125.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 435.0 315.596192385 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88505747126 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64803838335 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531034482759 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 653.4 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1252642269 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.25 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293204587102 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0985989985913 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540377016717 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201739008491 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275860250009 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.