Nowadays parents put too much pressure on their children to succeed What is the reason for doing this Is this a negative or positive development

In many parts of the world today, folks have been more concerned about children issues. It is veracious that children in these days reluctantly meet numerous demands from their parents. This essay attempts to point out diverse reasons why these situations can sustain. Apart from that, some detrimental impacts which are triggered from these tactics will be demonstrated in this essay.

There have been numerous reasons why parents are fond of contributing burdens on their children. First and foremost, parents have expected the success of their child, and they hope that their children can be peers with others. Indeed, in some VN+ articles in Vietnam, in virtue of the fact parents of this nation have been jealous with children of others, they always require their kids acquiring high scores. As a bonus, parents hypothesised that these tenets can render aids for children who are not intrigued in studying. This can be fathomed that children will probably obtain more incentives via these tactics, and the awareness of kids which are sabotaged due to some factors will be enhanced. From this point, children can have more scope to reinforce themselves. As highlight for this point, following some CNN articles, numerous parents in Vietnam always create more work for their children. In virtue of the fact that most parents are frightened that their kids would utilize their leisure times in superfluous things.
There have been numerous folks who are in favor of the idea: these trends will create terrible prospects. First of all, children will probably suffer from metal sicknesses if these trends sustain in some ways. Parents strive their best to create more compulsory situations which children must work spontaneously. Children may have no break times, or they do not have facilities to wind down in some ways. It is understood that most children will perceive stressed, and they will miss more hopes of lives. Concretely, many children have gained many deleterious issues which relate to their mental health: depression or autism. These spectacles have been triggered by pressures from their parents. Another possibility is that children can have some negative performance in some aspects. It is explained that some kids cannot thrive their skills if they are entailed too much. In facts, many kids do not have abilities to focus on lessons or work due these issues. Furthermore, children would become not obedient. They will find ways which oppose their parents, and they can be appealed by bad friends. For instance, in some date from analysts, most kids who are criminals have perceived disappointed about their families.

In brief, parents ought to have more awareness of these trends due to their negative results. From this point, it is better for folks to cease aforementioned reasons of this issue.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1152, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
..., in some date from analysts, most kids who are criminals have perceived disappointed a...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, apart from, for instance, in brief, in fact, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 7.85571142285 267% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 55.0 24.0651302605 229% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2375.0 1615.20841683 147% => OK
No of words: 457.0 315.596192385 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19693654267 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50776365867 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463894967177 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 697.5 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 16.0721442886 168% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.2709310395 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.962962963 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9259259259 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.51851851852 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257682234043 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874958674903 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539275616316 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194175653688 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062084618387 0.056905535591 109% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.