Nowadays people hold different opinions about whether people should eat imported food or not. Some people think that it is completely appropriate when the quality of humans’ life is higher than before. In my opinion, I think that this tendency has positive and negative effects.
Nowadays people hold different opinions about whether people should eat imported food or not. Some people think that it is completely appropriate when the quality of humans’ life is higher than before. In my opinion, I think that this tendency has positive and negative effects.
On the one hand, eating food from other regions could provide people with a highly nutritious diet. Some nutritious fruits can not be grown in local places but it has greater benefits in promoting health and preventing disease. For instance, Vietnam’s weather is not appropriate to grow some fruits such as kiwis, blueberries and cherries which have higher nutrition than some local fruits, our country needs to import these fruits to meet local consumers’ demand. Moreover, the importation of food promotes the development of transportation and logistics. It creates employment for local people and contributes to solving the unemployment problems. Therefore, eating food from other regions has positive effects.
On the other hand, the price of imported fruits is alway higher than local fruits but they have the same quality. Consumers could save money by purchasing local food rather than imported food. Additionally, the transportation and preservation process could reduce food nutrition. For instance, Australian fruits do not retain their typical flavour after a few weeks of delivery to my country by sea freight. Moreover, the consumption of imported food products makes national agriculture develop slowly = stagnate and decrease farmers’ income significantly. Therefore, imported food has many negative effects on the development of the national economy.
In conclusion, although there are many benefits from/of having access to a wide variety of foods, eating food from other regions also has many negative effects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-10 | hungnguyen0719 | 78 | view |
- It is true that mobile phones and the internet have influenced the communication between people The development of cell phones and the internet has significantly affected the relationship of people and in my opinion there are both positive and negative ef 73
- The table shows the export values of various products in 2009 and 2010 78
- Advertising is becoming more and more common in everyday life Some people say that Advertising has a positive impact on our lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Today there are plenty of opposing opinions about whether intelligent machines will gradually replace the human race in present day society Many people argue that it can generate more drawbacks when using these machines in almost all industries However I 84
- Today there are plenty of opposing opinions as to whether governments should dedicate a considerable part of their budget to reinstating run down buildings or not It is claimed that public purse should be expended on the construction of new and safer buil 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 7, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...positive and negative effects. On the one hand, eating food from other regions...
^^
Line 5, column 251, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... transportation and preservation process could reduce food nutrition. For instanc...
^^
Line 5, column 438, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ea freight. Moreover, the consumption of imported food products makes national ag...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58844765343 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83942170435 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57761732852 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.6922785867 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.75 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3125 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4375 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384909511291 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136302039891 0.084324248473 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.161619763304 0.0667982634062 242% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294090899714 0.151304729494 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.335187292724 0.056905535591 589% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.