nowadays people live in the society where consumer goods are cheaper to buy do you think it’s advantageous out to win disadvantage
In this present era, consumer goods prices are a matter for a person to live in any societies. People live in a region, where consumer goods are cheaper to buy. This essay will enshrine both aspects of this phenomena and also explain which side has the higher effect positive or negative.
To embarks with, plenty of drawbacks of this thinking, which creates harmful effects. First and foremost, cheaper goods mean people have to compromise with the quality, that product can not use for a long time. Furthermore, cheaper quality products generate pollution, which harms humans, animals as well as birds. For example, the cheaper packaging materials are made from plastic, That manufacturing process emitted pollution into the environment. These are the main two disadvantage of cheaper consumer goods.
On the other hand, Numbers of advantages of less priced consumer goods. Firstly, cheaper consumer goods mean mass production, which required a large number of employees, therefore economical goods are a reasonable thing because that generates job opportunity. Secondly, if people buy goods which has a low price, then people can save a particular amount of money, which they can use in future planning. For instance, any person went to buy a watch and he brought a watch, which price was low as compared to others, therefore he saved a little amount of money.
To conclude, although cheaper of course has demerits, it has more merits than demerits. Low-quality goods cannot run for long periods and also generates pollution, whereas helps to save money. In my opinion, advantages are outweighed disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-12 | Kishanpatel | 78 | view |
- more and more students choose to go to other country for their higher education do you think the benefits out with the problems associated with it 67
- today the life expectancy of people is much higher than before some people think that older people should continue to be involved in the workforce to what extent do you agree or disagree 76
- Many people use distance learning program to study at home but some people think that is cannot bringing the benefit as much as attending college or university to what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- increase the word demand for oil and gas made it necessary for locating these sores in remote and untouched nature areas do you think the advantages out with the disadvantages of domaging this nature areas 61
- No I deer in many countries household waste example for packaging is increasing day by day what are the causes for that how can this problem is solved 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...his essay will enshrine both aspects of this phenomena and also explain which side h...
^^^^
Line 5, column 142, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ds mean mass production, which required a large number of employees, therefore economical goods ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch required a large number of employees, therefore economical goods are a reasona...
^^
Line 5, column 473, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t to buy a watch and he brought a watch, which price was low as compared to other...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, whereas, for example, for instance, of course, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27413127413 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7301092504 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606177606178 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0294777471 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0666666667 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2666666667 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6666666667 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239779055385 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.095133677014 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111112475418 0.0667982634062 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144570305569 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544740049768 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.