Nowadays, people, the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?
Has this become a positive or negative development?
These days technology is changing the way many people communicate with each other and has influenced the type of people interacting in various ways. These changes have some positive and negative implications in terms of communicating, but I believe the positive impact of technology on relationships is more conspicuous.
Technology has ushered humanity into a new epoch in connection that has a profound impact on the interactions people make. First, it seems with more developed applications people prefer to use them to make contact which is so convenient. In addition, they cannot afford enough time to interact with each other anymore. Accordingly, social applications and networking have a wide appeal among people like Facebook and Whatsapp which make a way for keeping in touch or foster new relationships. What's more, the quality of interaction which people make through the virtual world has significantly declined in several respects like emotions, sentimentality, and passions. So that technology brings about confusion and misunderstanding since people do not able to express their real feelings via these modern devices vividly. It is a given that, most virtual communication people make, have less emotional express compare with face-to-face communications.
But the thing is the advancements that technology affords, make the possible drawbacks pale In comparison. In the first place, it can pave the way for having a sustainable form of interaction. The access to the communication applications provides certain conditions to people stay in touch with each other at any time and anywhere. Also, with the advent of technology, the barrier of long-distance communications seems to be eradicated that had a huge impact on the relationships of those people emigrated overseas. It facilitates them to be in touch with their families more than before and provide for them a possibility to make a video call to see family members and enjoy it occasionally.
In conclusion, technology has certainly revolutionized communication between people. Despite having some downside aspects that have affected people's relationship, it is a great step into future communication.
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 82
- Nowadays people the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 73
- Nowadays people the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 73
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 84
- Nowadays, people, the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
These days technology is changing the way many peo...
^^^^
Line 3, column 494, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...g in touch or foster new relationships. Whats more, the quality of interaction which ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, so, in addition, in conclusion, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1852.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54491017964 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32900205052 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568862275449 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9758645953 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.75 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.399559003678 0.244688304435 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124583929138 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844531455252 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244963492307 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10323153232 0.056905535591 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.