Nowadays, robots do more and more jobs instead of humans.Does this development have more advantages or disadvantages ?
During the last decades, due to the advancement in technology a lot has changed in the workplaces. As a result, more work is done by the machines compared to people. In this essay, I will explore the pros and cons of this improvement and try to draw some conclusions.
I will start by looking at the merits. One of the major plus point is that work is done faster by robots as compared to humans. For example, to complete a certain production the company requires a lot of man power, although having this the work is not completed in a period. However, to complete a task in limited period is abundantly crucial to maintain the reputation of the workplace, therefore large companies use these machines to complete a given work faster. Secondly, more often supervision is not required for robots. Conversely, when it comes to living person it is essential to supervise them every two to three hours.
On the other hand, numerous companies use robots to complete their work. Due to this, there is heavy unemployment among human beings. Thousands of people lose jobs because machines replace them. Almost all workplaces have this technology, hence people are unable to find manual jobs and remain unemployed for several months. Another major drawback of this development is that humans become lazy and various distractions are created in their sedentary lifestyle. For instance, large portion of work are done by machines, thus humans are less physically active and this leads to obesity and health issues.
To conclude, there are both positives and negatives to this way of development. In spite of the fact that work is done faster by robots and does not require a lot of supervision, many consequences arise to human life such as unemployment and health issues. I believe that this development has more drawbacks than advantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-11 | hoangduy | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-11 | hoangduy | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | Ahmed Salem | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | Ahmed Salem | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-14 | Johndavisvu | 73 | view |
- The pie charts below shows the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France for two years
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 74
- The chart below shows the percentages of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002 82
- The chart below gives information about the household percentage of spending on essential goods in China for the years 1995 and 2011 75
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s. As a result, more work is done by the machines compared to people. In this ess...
^^
Line 5, column 407, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t is that humans become lazy and various distractions are created in their sedent...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...has more drawbacks than advantages.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, hence, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98376623377 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77135637815 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564935064935 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.2139246233 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2777777778 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226122618011 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699845384526 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659509984128 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143262541911 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514689446032 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.