Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Is this a positive or negative development

Essay topics:

Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.  In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?  Is this a positive or negative development ?

It is a common belief that technology has influenced how people communicate with others in recent days. This essay will discuss the impact of advanced technology and why it is a negative development.

One the one hand, it is undoubtedly that technology helps people in most aspects of daily life. First of all, the advanced technology make human feel more convenient and handy to contact with others through using portable devices such as mobile phone or computer to access to the Internet. In addition, mastered technology may provide many opportunities to acquire a job or more college’s relation, especially when the COVID-19 disease has spread out the world, leading to countless unemployment. Take an example of the young generation, who mostly use technology, they can easily chat with their friends, meeting online thanks to social media, without concern to the geographic boundaries. That is the reason why technology benefits our life.

In contrast, reliance on technology may lead to many serious drawbacks. With the development in technology, people nowadays seem to be too lazy to have face-to-face conversation, which could stunt their ability to communicate as well as their language skills. Moreover, investing too much time on interacting with online people not only makes us tired but also causes many serious health problems. For instance, many people around us have been addicted because of spending much more time on the internet rather than live normally, which is called virtual living. Moreover, they can be threatened by online relationship such as discrimination, cheating or abusing. Those disadvantages make people concerned about their relationship throughout technology.

To sum up, interaction has been changed by the appearance of technology. And I totally believe that those disadvantages outweigh their advantages.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-15 heroprox1 56 view
2023-10-13 MinyiChu 61 view
2023-08-17 hau le 84 view
2023-08-05 Kiwi 89 view
2023-07-05 phamtrucmaiphuong 78 view
Essays by user longtran :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'colleges'' or 'college's'?
Suggestion: colleges'; college's
...ny opportunities to acquire job or more colleges relationship, especially when the COVID...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 592, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'chat'
Suggestion: chat
...ostly using technology, they can easily chatting with their friends, meeting online than...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 695, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dia, without concern to the geographical boundaries. That is the reason why techn...
^^
Line 5, column 749, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on their relation via using technology. To sum up, interaction has been changed ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, so, well, for instance, in addition, in contrast, such as, as well as, first of all, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46712802768 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99171319092 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615916955017 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4805680708 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.333333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2666666667 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306913317399 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0955336323364 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499061862697 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17766571329 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063724068956 0.056905535591 112% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.