Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development

Essay topics:

Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?
Has this become a positive or negative development?

Technology has changed the method that people life in communicating with others these days, such as social media, working, education and so on. I strongly believe that this development is more positive than negative.

The first way is the social media and online chatting which have many advantages for people in their personal and social relationship. First of all, social media and online chatting which can help people talk with their friends in everywhere or in every time, which let people always have more chances to connect with friends. Secondly, this method not only survey the real-time communication, hut also help people make more new friends from different software, such as Wechat, Facebook, Twitter and so on. Thirdly, although there will be less connect with friends face to face, it is a good way for people to keep their friendship for a long distance.

The second way is the working and education. During the COVID-19 period, many people must stay at home to keep safe and health which impact their job and study. Technology provide a good way for people in this terrible health problems to hold the regular life. As we all know, during epidemic stage, many people loss their job and many students cannot go to school. Long-distance working and education help more workers to earn money and let more students stay on study track which can decrease the complaint and turmoil.

In conclusion, technology make people life more convenient and improve our well-being level which is good for our society development.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-15 heroprox1 56 view
2023-10-13 MinyiChu 61 view
2023-08-17 hau le 84 view
2023-08-05 Kiwi 89 view
2023-07-05 phamtrucmaiphuong 78 view
Essays by user MinyiChu :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 173, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'provides'.
Suggestion: provides
... impact their job and study. Technology provide a good way for people in this terrible ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, in conclusion, such as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1285.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05905511811 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52465368868 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55905511811 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4415730818 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.083333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280833644422 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112508212942 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536673267055 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176051158162 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402093686833 0.056905535591 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.