It is true that technology has altered the path that people communicate with each other in recent years. Everything has two sides, and the “effects of technology on people’s relationship” os not on exception. We cannot deny how much technology transformed the individual reaction with others in his family or friends.
In my opinion, technology has affected on our life aspects and dealing with other people in a good way. For example, technology has an impact on relationship in business, education and social life. Firstly, the Internet allows business people interact without even meeting each other. Secondly, services like Skype create now possibilities for relationships between students and teachers. A student can take video lessons with a teacher in a different city or country. Finally, people can find old friends with social network, it is more chipper, faster and comfortable than old methods, such as letters. I think this is the best advantages.
On the other hand, this positive side can also have the result of isolating people and discouraging real interaction. I am sure that people will be used to virtual communication and will not to converse in real life.
In conclusion, I think all things have positive and negative sides, nothing is ideal. Unfortunately, all discoveries have only good parts, and only people add bad ones in bagth of time.
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?What measures do you think might be effective? 36
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons there relevant. 56
- increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.to what extent do you agree or disagree?what other measures do you think might be effective? 73
- The line chart shows average attendance at the cinema among various age groups in the US from 2000 to 2011 84
- Nowadays some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works by using the computer Do you agree or disagree 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1170.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 222.0 315.596192385 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27027027027 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07157006281 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.644144144144 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 364.5 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.1285668173 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.5714285714 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8571428571 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277105886398 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875051524659 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061683666331 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14467020303 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051422472952 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.