Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of
technology.
In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people
make? Has this been a positive or negative development?
Today, because of the development of technology, people are adopting their communication ways with others. While there are several aspects that are affected by technology, I think that it is a positive improvement.
The relationships among us have converted because of the changing of technology in recent years. Firstly, emails are replacing the traditional mails that we used to commute, in the past, with each other. Secondly, some social networks that are growing wider around the global, and these sites are helping us to connect, follow, interact with a majority of people all over the world. Besides, Facebook and Zalo also offer some services that support us to make a call or send a message to a relative who lives far away from home with a cheaper fee and shorter time. For example, Facetime is a smart app that can offer a free video call to people who stay wherever in the world.
Therefore, no one can refuse the advantages that modern technology bring to us. Because of fast and convenient emails, we can save the amount of time which we can use to do more works. Besides, the distance between us is made closer by some social network websites which give us lots of tools to communication around the global. For example, some important conferences now can carry out through the Livestream which is the discovery app that supports the indirect meeting through WiFi connected smartphones or tablets.
In conclusion, although the technology has changed the relationships among human, I believe that this tendency has several benefits for them.
- The media should include more stories which report good news. To whatextent do you agree or disagree? 84
- These days more fathers stay at home and take care of their children while mothers go out to work. What could be the reasons for this? Do you think it is a positive or a negative development? 73
- The graph below shows difference sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. 73
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024. 67
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 520, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... WiFi connected smartphones or tablets. In conclusion, although the technology h...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1304.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01538461538 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72859068029 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3749754613 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.666666667 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179070878015 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690544581131 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064270233036 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120839658777 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675120970231 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.