It is evident that technology has influenced on communication between people. In my opinion, this development has brought both advantages and disadvantages.
On the positive side, technology has an impact on relationships in business including business, education and social life. First of all, telephones and internet allows businessmen to contact with their partners without moving on a long distance. Doing business, therefore, has been much easier and more efficient . In addition, it has made life more convenient for consumers as people can just pick up the phone to place or check on order. Secondly, services like Skype helps students to study with their teachers or connect with each other while staying at home. Last but not least, many people use social networks, like Facebook, to find and make friends with others who share the same interest. It also enables people to stay in touch with friends and relatives both near and far.
On the negative side, using technology actually makes people busier since they are constantly contactable. Accordingly, it often interrupts us and can even keep us from accomplishing our daily tasks. For instance, the telephone can bring us plenty of unwanted calls. Otherwise, the availability of new communication technology can have the result of isolating people and discouraging real interaction. For example, many young people choose to make friends online rather than mixing with their peers in real life, and these relationships are such a poor substitute for real friendships. This may be a particular problem for a child's social development as they are now too often indoors, which will cause a sedentary lifestyle.
In conclusion, technology has revolutionized communication between people, but not all the outcomes of this revolution are positive.
- Visitors to a Local Cinema According to Age 84
- The bar chart below illustrates the use of tobacco products by secondary school students in the United States 81
- Q: Without capital punishment our lives are less secure and crimes of violence increase. Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Hydro-electric power generation. 84
- Q: Without capital punishment our lives are less secure and crimes of violence increase. Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, also, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42348754448 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0302485879 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640569395018 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1733921485 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.25 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240295896846 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692690786582 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492511609904 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12217009316 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051494785047 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.