Nowadays the way of people interact with each other has become changed because of technology. In what way has technology affected the types of relationship that people make? Has this been a positive or a negative development?
Irrefutably, the methods of communications have been changed recently over the years by the advent of technology. Obviously, it has impacted on everything even affinity. Undoubtedly, everything has its pros and cons, so the same in this case. However, I personally believe that the demerits of the use of technology in kinship are outweigh it's merits and I intend to support my view in following paragraphs.
To begin with, undoubtedly technology has proved to be a boon for society, however, it has altered the ways of talking in relationship by numerous factors. First and foremost, the majority of people across the globe prefer to more communicate with the virtual world rather than the tangible by the advent of internet. Moreover, They give much importance to unknown persons instead of thier own family. Consequently, the adequate interaction is abolishing among the kinship.
Secondly, the usage of several slangs during online chatting have become ubiquitous among the masses, hence, this vogue impacts on thier mother tounge when they speak with anyone. Therefore, it completely deteriorates any triditional language's accent. Furtheremore, a plenty of married persons socialize constantly with several opposite genders on social sites, as a result, various squabbles take birth in happy married life, which eradicate the good interconnections among the couples.
On the other hand, certain benefits can not be neglected, in this modern era people can easily communicate face to face with each other from any part of the world by the help of the advancement. Secondly, the international barrier seems to be eradicated by the advent of social applications such as Facebook, Instagram etcetera. People from several countries have become more closer, they can easily make new friends from all over the world and interact with them from anywhere and anytime through the social sites, which have made people's life more convenient.
To recapitulate, undoubtedly, technology has several benefits, however, people will encounter continuously ample brawls in relationship until they reduce the use of technology in their kinship.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-27 | Karan42 | 84 | view |
| 2018-09-08 | phantadu119@gmail.com | 56 | view |
- Nowadays the way of people interact with each other has become changed because of technology. In what way has technology affected the types of relationship that people make? Has this been a positive or a negative development? 84
- Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers, not people. Why? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 78
- More and more people work from home and study from home with the development of computer technology. Do you think it is positive or negative 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hods of communications have been changed recently over the years by the advent of...
^^
Line 1, column 333, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'outweighed'.
Suggestion: outweighed
...of the use of technology in kinship are outweigh its merits and I intend to support my v...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...by numerous factors. First and foremost, the majority of people across the globe ...
^^
Line 5, column 375, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...te genders on social sites, as a result, various squabbles take birth in happy ma...
^^
Line 8, column 372, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'closer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: closer
...ople from several countries have become more closer, they can easily make new friends from ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1814.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49696969697 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98450851779 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59696969697 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6190716026 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.933333333 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221897450039 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057868373519 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514406755546 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107981493294 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400103838383 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.