Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced?
In recent years, the amount of garbage has been increasing. Although overpopulation and consumerism are the major reasons for this tendency, I still believe that governments and individuals should take several measures to deal with the enormous number of rubbish.
Various reasons explain the increasing amount of rubbish in many nations. First and foremost, overpopulation has contributed to the increase of garbage, and waste from people and their daily activities, such as consuming meals and leaving behind leftover food packaging. All kinds of waste are hard to disintegrate and cause harm to the environment. In addition, the amount of waste is from overconsumption and consumerism trend. Manufacturers keep producing retail products at an alarming rate, while the consumer has gotten into replacing old items and using up-to-date furniture, especially electronic devices. As a result, the accumulation of rubbish in landfills has been more than ever before.
It seems to me that governments and individuals should take more actions to deal with the rubbish amount. The first remedy is that the authority should ban strict regulations on throwing rubbish away everywhere in lieu of putting rubbish in public containers. Furthermore, industrial factories and companies should solve waste after discharging waste to the main areas to reduce and manage waste. Finally, governments should focus on raising the awareness of citizens. For instance, people encourage to use recyclable items, such as bags in lieu of plastic containers, which are hard to disintegrate. As a result, this action contributes to a green living style with fewer disposal.
In conclusion, several factors contribute to the habit of wastage, but these issues are not insurmountable. I would advise the government to consider the points I have highlighted above to curtail the consistent rise of wastage.
- 14 1 2017 In schools and universities girls tend to choose arts while boys like sciences What are the reasons for this tendency and do you think this tendency should be changed 76
- The picture below shows the recycling process of wasted glass bottles 81
- Nowadays parents put too much pressure on their children to succeed What is the reason for doing this Is it a negative or positive development 89
- It is suggested that everyone wants to have a car a television and a fridge Do the disadvantages of this development for society outweighthe advantages 89
- The graph below shows how people bought music from 2011 to 2018 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 500, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'using'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: using
...itizens. For instance, people encourage to use recyclable items, such as bags in lieu ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, so, still, while, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51903114187 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09940745185 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612456747405 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2707134912 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6875 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0625 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180512731531 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546766673256 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554145243655 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0935820421821 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447467021496 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.