Nowdays, more people are choosing to socialise online rather than face to face . Is this is a positive or negative development?
These days, online is the major development in the world. Therefore, most of the people are using social websites for the communication instead of individualy interaction. In my opinion, this development have some negative impacts in the life of people.
According to the first school of thoughts, online social media creates many difficulties for the masses as these days most of the people are interacting with their friends on these websites instead of meeting them. Before the online, people are prefer to go the restaurant , café and many more places to meet their near and dear ones but now people are chatting online with their friends which leads to isolation among the people. As this result, most of the masses are suffering from depression and anxiety.
Another issue is that, meeting people online can be risky. In other words, people can assume fake identity and hide their real characteristics. This is particularly about for teenagers who are impressionable and can easily be led into dangerous situations. Furthermore, as this interaction is online , parents have no way to monitoring and protecting their children.
Finally, the conversation with strangers can lead a horrible situation for the person as most of the people are sharing their personal details and photos with them and they are misusing it, which is harmful for the
people. Further, information which input online can stay there forever and while people may share intimate communication with close friends, these words can then resurface later leading to much embarrassment.
In conclusion, although it has become more popular for people to socialize through internet. This is considered as positive development but sometimes it creates many negative situations. So people should use the internet carefully.
- The charts below shows the percentage of time eorking adults spent on working adults spent on different activities in a particulur country in 1958 and 2008 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetabkes per day in the IKfrom 2001 and 2008. 78
- Recent studies have show that overweight people tend to eat junk food that the highest in the fat some people argue that increases in the price of such food will serve as to reduce the amount of overweight people To what extent do you agree or disagree 77
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 67
- The development of tourism contributed to English becoming the most prominent language in the world. Some people think this will lead to English becoming the only language to spoken globally. What are the advantage and disadvantaged to having one languag 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 273, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
..., people are prefer to go the restaurant , café and many more places to meet their...
^^
Line 5, column 300, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rthermore, as this interaction is online , parents have no way to monitoring and p...
^^
Line 8, column 188, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
... words can then resurface later leading to much embarrassment. In conclusion, a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, so, then, therefore, while, in conclusion, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37102473498 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86307189413 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56890459364 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6767024666 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.333333333 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8666666667 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190875357085 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770796594123 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464731819345 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107923774696 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605267428714 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.