as the number of cars increases, more money has to be spent on the road system. Some people think the government should pay for this. Others, however, think that the user should cover the costs. Discuss and give your opinion
It is believed that more investment has to be spent on the road system due to the volume of cars increases. While some people believed that government should respond for financial responsibility. I incline to the opinion that the users have to bear this burden
On the one hand, the government is facing a lot of negative issues when they support funding on all roads. Firstly, spending funding on all roads undermines government budget. There are traffic facilities such as cameras and traffic light accounted for transport infrastructure. Despite assistance in control and coordinate the commute, they are easily to be damage under environmental conditions, requiring a tremendous cost in installation and maintenance. Secondly, road systems can trigger the detrimental shortage of agriculture land. The land for building road are limited so if government invest money on constructing them, it is cultivating lands which have to be sacrificed for this innovation; hence the more roads government build, the less lands for cultivating farmers have. As a result, these farmers cannot produce enough products for consumer demands, causing the scarcity of essentially agriculture products
On the other hand, the road users should bear this burden due to some positive reasons. Firstly, this aids people to avoid transportation issues. People utilizing the roads to commute are imposed a high cost on maintenance and reconstruction which accidentally cut off the growth of cars, leading to the less traffic transportations which are the foremost reasons of traffic congestion at the rush hours. Besides that, environmental systems can benefit from this reduction since fewer greenhouse fumes evaporate from these cars to the air, decreasing the global warming effects. Secondly, government can have more financial resources to invest on social amenities. Education, social health and infrastructure are some fields that can be bettered by this funding, innovating lives of residents and reducing the affecting of illnesses and uneducated issues.
In conclusion, car users covering the expense on road systems is far better than government, brings tremendously positive effect for residents and transportation issues
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-28 | Pau Nguyen | 84 | view |
- People in many countries have to spend more and more time away from their home Why is this What are the effects on people themselves and their families 73
- Fossil fuel is the main source of energy In some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged To what extent do you think is it a positive or negative development 89
- Students today can easily access information online so libraries are no longer necessary Do you agree or disagree 84
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many places And how to increase its popularity 84
- as the number of cars increases more money has to be spent on the road system Some people think the government should pay for this Others however think that the user should cover the costs Discuss and give your opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 325, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...te assistance in control and coordinate the commute, they are easily to be damage under env...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 720, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'roads'' or 'road's'?
Suggestion: roads'; road's
...ced for this innovation; hence the more roads government build, the less lands for cu...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 748, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun lands is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ce the more roads government build, the less lands for cultivating farmers have. As ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for residents and transportation issues
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, while, as to, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1882.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58456973294 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08966064002 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560830860534 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.7640503846 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.466666667 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4666666667 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311886819303 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0975411572018 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566265746573 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204225746254 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723271115014 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.