In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe that money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both the views and give your opinion.
In the salad days of the millennium the society is polarised almost equally, regarding the notion whether it is substantial to spend enormous amount of capital in developing the new railway tracks for swift movement of trains between two regions or beside, the monetary funds which is provided by government should be utilized in improving the existing transportation system. Different people have the distinct mindset. The following paragraph would shed light on both the view before giving the final verdict.
To commence with the first notion, there are myriad of things to be shared in its favor. First and foremost, with the evolution in technology and modern engineering, certain marvels provided the world to commute between two places which are distant in no time. As a result of Tesla founder and Managing Director, "Alon Musk" had invented a new technology known as Hyperloop which runs on a specialized track in enclosed tunnels. Secondly, there is an essential need of such capital to be invested which in turn benefits the mammoth population of the country. Consequently, travel would be completed in less time and it also proves to be convenient, comfortable and safe.
Shifting towards the second school of thought, it is also true that masses won't be able to travel with these upcoming technologies because rather they would be extravagant. Hence, the law enforcement agency should plan for a backup options as motorways which is the backbone of any nation. Not only metropolitan cities are connected with the highway, but also small towns are joined. Therefore, the government should spend funds in building smooth roads equipped with dazzling street lamps. Moreover, enhancement should be enforced to upgrade the government buses so each individual find the seat comfortable with the meliorate facility and the discovery of routes must be carried out.
In conclusion, there are many supporters who state that investing in new technologies sound rubbish to them and they are only satisfied with modern state of art improvement but my argument proves that ameliorate version of transport is far best to travel as it is less time-consuming.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-21 | Naman Kumar Singh | 89 | view |
- Learning English at schools is often seen as more important than learning local languages if they are not taught many are in risk of dying out.In your opinion . is it important for everyone to learn English? Should we try to ensure the survival of the loc 84
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe that money should be spent on improving existing public transport.Discuss both 89
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emission which results from this energy use.Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comp 67
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. 73
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business, and the academic world. Othersbelieve that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and g 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 615, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...dividual find the seat comfortable with the meliorate facility and the discovery of routes mu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1834.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28530259366 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85080110032 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608069164265 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 84.1747756584 49.4020404114 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7857142857 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146103946279 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0448204446117 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403748138622 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0900636583746 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530884365162 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.