People have distinct views about the improvement of transportation system. Some people believe that money should be spent on constructing new railway lines. However, others opine that improving existing public transportation is best. In this essay, I will discuss both views and state my own position.
Examining the first view, some individuals favour that using money for making new railway lines
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: lethianhthu
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:
- The pie graphs below show the results of a survey of children's activities. The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in, whereas the second graph shows the activities in which girls participate. 73
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving the existing public transport. Discuss bo 22
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 41.998997996 10% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 341.0 1615.20841683 21% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 61.0 315.596192385 19% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59016393443 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 2.79468239267 4.20363070211 66% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79699228023 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 51.0 176.041082164 29% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.83606557377 0.561755894193 149% => OK
syllable_count: 100.8 506.74238477 20% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 16.0721442886 31% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 12.0 20.2975951904 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 9.35093578205 49.4020404114 19% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 68.2 106.682146367 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.2 20.7667163134 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.6 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.38176352705 46% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394721852793 0.244688304435 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.192146885775 0.084324248473 228% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135356692157 0.0667982634062 203% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281414877441 0.151304729494 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756735015131 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 50.2224549098 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.2 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.25 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 20.0 78.4519038076 25% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.1190380762 67% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 22.4719101124 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.