In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving the existing public transport. Discuss both views and give your own opinions.
Nowadays, it is argued that a large amount of money is necessarily spent ion building new interregional train lines instead of on developing the old public transport. While I accept that there are persuasive arguments in favor of the former, I believe the latter could be advantageous to some extent.
On the one hand, first and foremost, developing the old existing transport system could be an essential method to save money in developing countries. With their completion at hand, the only job left would only be the upgrade to a new level of safety or decoration, which might not take that large amount of money compared to building a whole new system. Second, it could play an important role in conserving the environment. In many countries, due to their land shortage, the government have to resort to a vast area of forests to be cleared in order to make room for modern railways. This, in turn, could have an adverse effect as it decreases the diversity in their biological system.
On the other hand, constructing new railways could also be beneficial to some extent. With the development of modern technology, new railways could significantly become faster and more modern. This would not only save the people a lot of time transferring from one mode of transport to another, but also money in purchasing one ticket instead of many. Moreover, gas emission would have to be taken into account in this matter. As the existing transport system might be degrading over many years of utilizing, the gas emission rate would be unbearable, while the new railway system with their green engines could be a piece in the critical solution to the universal problem of global warming.
By and large, while I support the fact that constructing a new railway system connecting cities could have some undoubted advantages, I believe that upgrading the existing public transportation would still have its perks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-31 | anmol khipal ajay | 22 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | mustafa312540@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2018-04-12 | minhtu21 | 56 | view |
- The table shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same 2 periods. 95
- The graph below gives information about the price of bananas in four countries between 1994 and 2004 67
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 42
- The graph below shows the population change between 1940 and 2000 in three different counties in the U.S. state of Oregon.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, still, while, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80144867883 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526645768025 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8322560299 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.692307692 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5384615385 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25216207952 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934171655583 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670661470618 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172552500967 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368428529182 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.