In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Other believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Infrastructure is considered to be vital for the economy, education, and stability of the country. This essay discusses whether the development shall be on improving existing public transport or on new railroads for very fast trains.
With an assessment of the current situation of public transport, it is possible to take a decision regarding which sector deserves the investment. Super-fast trains have prerequisites, although they are essential for further development of any nation. For instance, African countries, where paved roads are not likely existing, should concentrate on such levels of infrastructure. Normally, train stations are located in cities, where highways are present to connect it to other parts of the city. If there are no such roads, it will be impossible to reach a train station. Thus, in similar circumstances, planners must first introduce the first layer of infrastructure, which consists mainly of cars-suitable roads. Then, they can consider further planning of railways. As long as this basic requirement is not ready, any spending on railways is a waste of resources.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, super-fast trains are indispensable for the progress of a country. Even if it had already an efficient traditional rail network, it would better evolve. By evolving this transport technology, it would have a direct impact on the economy. When considering the distribution of goods across the country, the rapid delivery of raw materials and final products would not only increase the productivity but also the income. Furthermore, introducing swift transportation capabilities between cities would eventually increase educational mobility, because students would travel more easily to their universities. Moreover, in case of a military conflict, such modernization would affect the speed of mobilization significantly, as Germany did in the First World War when Germany was able to mobilize millions of soldiers and transfer them to the frontline within weeks. Therefore, it will contribute to the security of the nation.
All in all, modern very fast trains are out of question. As it is a matter of time, that all countries all over the world will utilize this technology, yet it has some requirements such as roads. Hence, I strongly agree that governments must invest in super-fast trains after fulfilling the previous level of infrastructure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-20 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Tường Vân | 73 | view |
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor in the journal Health Matters.Statistics gathered over the past three decades show that the death rate is higher among who do not have jobs among those with regular employment. Unemployment, just like heart 69
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Other, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both these views and give you 84
- If rituals did not exist, we would have to invent them. We need ceremonies and rituals to help us define ourselves socially and culturally. 83
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 66
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 81
Comments
Is not it required to mention
Is not it required to mention your opinion in the introduction as well?
You have not discussed both
You have not discussed both sides. Have not you?
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, then, therefore, thus, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2024.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51498637602 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24550270318 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613079019074 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2772203011 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.2 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.35 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185682370807 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523362366769 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588226214026 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122209142157 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.072686824798 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.