There is a commonly held belief that constructing new railway lines which simplify the fast transportation between cities is necessary. However, some assert that it is a complete waste and the budget should be spent to solve existing transport problems.
To begin with, the most rational justification is that a large volume of money needs to building these railroads. Some assert that this statement could be used in other essential projects and improving existing roads is more irrational. That is if old and broken, society's public transports should be repaired. Take the accident rate in some developing countries which take place owing to poor and damaged public transport as an example. These accidents possess irreversible injuries for people and society every year.
Yet another compelling argument is that new railway line benefits in this fast-changing world are by no means negligible. Simply put, it provides easy and comfortable traveling between cities as a frantic pace which is a crucial achievement. A good illustration is commuters who spend lots of their time on the roads between their homes and office every day. This in turn has a significant effect on their life from saving their time and energy to convenient traveling. Furthermore, new moving systems are eco-friendly and the most fuel-efficient. This is to say, they do not emit greenhouse gases and pollute the environment. Because the new trains and also vehicles work with electricity which is clean and less harmful.
To sum up, considering the point discussed above, I believe that the most conclusion to be drawn is that the necessity of new railway lines is inevitable. It provides fast and efficient travelling along with the preservation of the environment.
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 84
- People in community now could buy cheaper consumer goods Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Some people think that changing jobs periodically is good Do you agree or disagree 82
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be compulsory part of high school programs for example working for charity improve the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extend do you agree or disagree 73
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both these vi 78
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 50, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., considering the point discussed above, I believe that the most conclusion to be...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23928571429 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96750900485 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617857142857 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.8059065814 49.4020404114 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.6875 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311000765361 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806960172829 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611267262455 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179553621157 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0799349164356 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 50, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., considering the point discussed above, I believe that the most conclusion to be...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23928571429 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96750900485 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617857142857 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.8059065814 49.4020404114 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.6875 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311000765361 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806960172829 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611267262455 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179553621157 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0799349164356 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.